World's Largest English Language News Service with Over 500
Articles Updated Daily
"The News You Need Today…For The World You’ll Live In Tomorrow."
What You Aren’t
Being Told About The World You Live In
How The “Conspiracy Theory” Label Was Conceived To Derail The
Truth Movement
How Covert American Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive and Destroy Reputations
September 17, 2023
Shockingly Reality Is About To
Decimate Biden’s American Sheeple Flock
By: Sorcha Faal,
and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A foreboding new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov officially declared to the world this morning: “No matter what it says, the United States controls this war, it supplies weapons, munitions, intelligence information, data from satellites, it is pursuing a war against us”, says this official declaration that a state of war now exists between the Russian Federation and United States followed President Donald Trump gravely warning the American peoples about Supreme Socialist Leader Joe Biden yesterday: “We have a man who is totally corrupt and the worst president in the history of our country, who is cognitively impaired, in no condition to lead, and is now in charge of dealing with Russia and possible nuclear war...Just think of it...We will be in World War III very quickly if we're going to be relying on this man, and it will be far more devastating than any war”.
In full support of deranged and demented Socialist Leader Biden leading Americans into World War III, this report notes, yesterday it saw warmongering former Vice President Mike Pence grimly warning the American peoples: “I’m convinced that if the Ukrainian military doesn’t stop and repel that Russian invasion, it’s not going to be too long before that Russian army crosses a border that our men and women in uniform are going to have to go and fight for under our NATO Treaty...I truly believe it”—a grim warning joined by the article “Three Reasons Why Military Recruitment Is In Crisis”, wherein it revealed: “Many young men in middle America see a disconnect between the regime's latest wars and actual defense of the homeland”—the just published article “Navy Puts The Kibosh On Digital Recruiting Program After Discovering Enlistees Aren’t Into Drag Queens” further reveals: “On Thursday, acting Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti confirmed that the Navy is expected to miss its fiscal year 2023 recruiting goals by roughly 7,000 sailors…The revelation came days after the Air Force announced it would miss its “active-duty recruiting goals for the first time since 1999”...The U.S. Army and Coast Guard are also expected to miss their respective fiscal year 2023 recruiting targets”—it was also just reported: “Top NATO military official Dutch Admiral Rob Bauer, the chair of NATO's military committee, warned on Saturday that a drastic rise in ammunition prices means that allies' higher defence spending does not automatically translate into greater security”—and in the just published article “Ukraine Isn’t The Reason the U.S. Is Unprepared For War”, sees it gravely observing: “Our country could very well lose a large-scale war for lack of weapons and ammunition—but not because of aid to Ukraine…In a major conflict, the U.S. would run out of munitions in a few weeks, and in less than a week for some crucial categories…The quantity of weapons we are providing Ukraine is marginal compared with necessary weapons that we have not stocked...Over the past nine fiscal years, budget after budget has traded away combat power, truncated needed weapons early, and permanently closed production lines”.
In preparation for World War III, this report continues, NATO announced on Saturday: “In 2024, the Alliance will be holding its largest collective defense exercise since the Cold War: STEADFAST DEFENDER...Over 40,000 troops from across the Alliance will exercise in Germany, Poland and the three Baltic States”—an announcement of war NATO joined with the threat: “NATO, in accordance with its new defense plans, can deploy 300,000 soldiers in the first month of a potential attack on the bloc, while the total number of the alliance’s military personnel could reach 3.5 million people”—but is a meaningless threat because under the Nuclear War Doctrine Of The Russian Federation, at the slightest hint that NATO is assembling such a force, Russian nuclear strikes will be unleashed against every NATO and American military base in the world.
While actually insane Socialist Leader Biden and his NATO forces prepare to wage a war
against the world’s largest nuclear weapons power Russia that they haven’t the manpower, weapons or ammunition to
sustain, this report details, today it was reported: “Gasoline prices have surged to a record high for this time of
year in the United States, jeopardizing the fight against inflation that’s
dogged President Joe Biden”—with the BRICS Alliance controlling 80% of the world’s oil production, its two largest oil producing nations Russia and Saudi Arabia have drastically cut production to skyrocket the price of oil
to the socialist Western colonial powers—to keep the price of gasoline artificially
low, it saw Socialist Leader Biden draining America’s strategic oil reserves meant for times of
war by a beyond staggering 200 million gallons, and is now at an historic low—today Russia
is preparing to ban all oil exports to stabilize prices—and it was also just reported: “There appears to be no end in sight for the current oil price
rally or for the bullish catalysts driving it as tightening supply combines
with the apparent return of Chinese demand growth”.
With the socialist indoctrinated and leftist media brainwashed American peoples about to be decimated by the shocking reality of what the real cost of oil is, and who are obediently following deranged Socialist Leader Biden like sheep to the slaughter, this report concludes, one of their last defenses of sanity is the non-profit Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR) organization, which reports about itself: “FAIR, the national media watch group, has been offering well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship since 1986…We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media practices that marginalize public interest, minority and dissenting viewpoints…As an anti-censorship organization, we expose neglected news stories and defend working journalists when they are muzzled...As a progressive group, FAIR believes that structural reform is ultimately needed to break up the dominant media conglomerates, establish independent public broadcasting and promote strong non-profit sources of information”—and in their just released document “Hyping Ukraine Counteroffensive, US Press Chose Propaganda Over Journalism”, sees it factually informing under socialist siege Americans:
It has been clear for some time that US corporate
news media have explicitly taken a side on the
For most of the war, most
of the
Triumphalist rhetoric soared in early 2023, as
optimistic talk of a game-changing “spring offensive” dominated
Over the last three months,
it has become clear that the Ukrainian military operation will not be the
game-changer it was sold as; namely, it will not significantly roll back the
Russian occupation and obviate the need for a negotiated settlement. Only after this became
undeniable did media report on the true costs of war to the Ukrainian people.
Overwhelming Optimism
In the runup
to the counteroffensive, US media were full of excited conversation about how
it would reshape the nature of the conflict. NATO Secretary General Jens
Stoltenberg told Radio Free Europe (4/21/23)
he was “confident
Former CIA Director David Patraeus, author of the overhyped “surge” strategy in
The Washington Post’s David
Ignatius (4/15/23) acknowledged that
“hope is not
a strategy”,
but still insisted that “Ukraine’s will to win—its determination to expel Russian
invaders from its territory at whatever cost—might be the X-factor in the
decisive season of conflict ahead”.
The New York Times (6/2/23) ran a story praising recruits
who signed up for the Ukrainian pushback, even though it “promises to be deadly”.
Times columnist Paul Krugman (6/5/23)
declared we were witnessing “the moral equivalent of D-Day”.
CNN (5/30/23) reported that
Ukrainians were “unfazed” as they “gear up for a counteroffensive”.
Cable news was replete with
buzz about how the counteroffensive, couched with modifiers like “long-awaited” or “highly anticipated”, could turn the tide in the
war. Nightly news shows (e.g., NBC, 6/15/23, 6/16/23) presented
audiences with optimistic statements from Ukrainian President Volodymyr
Zelenskyy and other figures talking about the imminent success.
Downplaying Reality
Despite the soaring rhetoric presented to
audiences, Western officials understood that the counteroffensive was all but
doomed to fail. This had been known long
before the above comments were reported, but media failed to include that fact
as prominently as the predictions for success.
On April 10, as part of the
Discord leaks story, the Washington Post (4/10/23)
reported that top secret documents showed that Ukraine’s drive would fall “well short” of its objectives, due to
equipment, ammunition and conscription problems. The document predicted “sustainment shortfalls” and only “modest territorial gains”.
The Post additionally cited
anonymous officials who claimed that the documents’ conclusions were
corroborated by a classified National Intelligence Council assessment, shown
only to a select few in Congress. The Post
spoke to a Ukrainian official who “did not dispute the revelations”, and acknowledged that it was “partially true”.
While the Post has yet to
publish the documents in full, the leaks and the other sources clearly painted
a picture of a potentially disastrous counteroffensive. Fear was so palpable that
the Biden administration privately worried about how he could keep up support
for the war when the widely hyped offensive sputtered. In the midst of this, Blinken
continued to dismiss the idea of a ceasefire, opting instead to pursue further
escalating the conflict.
Despite the importance of
these facts, they were hardly reported on by the rest of corporate media, and
dropped from subsequent war coverage. When the Post (6/14/23)
published a long article citing Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s cautious
optimism about the campaign, it neglected to mention its earlier reporting
about the government’s privately gloomier assessments. The documents only started
appearing again in the press after thousands were dead, and the campaign’s
failure undeniable.
In an honest press, excited
comments from politicians and commentators would be published alongside reports
about how even our highest-level officials did not believe that the
counteroffensive would amount to much.
Instead, anticipation was allowed to build while doubts were set to the
side.
Too ‘Casualty-Averse’?
By July, Ukrainian
casualties were mounting, and it became clearer and clearer that the
counteroffensive would fail to recapture significant amounts of Ukrainian
territory. Reporting grew more
realistic, and we were given insights into conditions on the ground in
According to the Washington
Post (8/17/23), US and Ukrainian militaries had conducted war games and had
anticipated that an advance would be accompanied by heavy losses.
But when the real-world fatalities mounted, the Post reported, “
This caused a rift between
the Ukrainians and their Western backers, who were frustrated at Ukrainians’
desire to keep their people alive. A
mid-July New York Times article (7/14/23)
reported that US officials were
privately frustrated that
Acknowledging Failure
After it became undeniable
that
The Journal acknowledged
that Western officials simply “hoped Ukrainian courage and resourcefulness would carry the
day”.
One Post column (7/26/23) asked, “Was Gen. Mark Milley Right Last Year About
the War in
And when
one official told Politico (8/18/23),
“Milley had a
point”,
acknowledging the former military head’s November suggestion for negotiations.
The quote was so telling that Politico made it the headline of the
article.
Even Rep. Andy Harris (D-Md.), co-chair of the congressional Ukraine Caucus,
publicly questioned whether or not the war was “winnable” (Politico,
8/17/23). Speaking on the
counteroffensive’s status, he said, “I’ll be blunt, it’s failed”.
Newsweek (8/16/23) reported on a Ukrainian
leadership divided over how to handle the “underwhelming” counteroffensive. The Washington Post (8/17/23) reported that the
As the triumphalism
ebbed, outlets began reporting on scenes that were almost certainly common
before the spring push but had gone unpublished. One piece from the Post (8/10/23) outlined a “darkened mood in
The Wall Street Journal (8/1/23) published a devastating piece
about the massive number of amputees returning home from the mine-laden
battlefield. They reported that between
20,000 and 50,000 Ukrainians had lost one or more limbs as a result of the
war—numbers that are comparable to those seen during World War I.
Rather than dwelling on the
stalled campaign, the New York Times and other outlets focused on the drone war
against
War As Desirable Outcome
The fact that
The answer has been clear since before the
war. Despite the high-minded rhetoric
about support for democracy, this has never been the goal of pushing for war in
In December 2021, as Russian
President Vladimir Putin began to mass troops at Ukraine’s border while
demanding negotiations, John Deni of the Atlantic
Council published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal (12/22/21) headlined “The Strategic Case for
Risking War in Ukraine”, which laid out the US logic explicitly: Provoking a
war would allow the US to impose sanctions and fight a proxy war that would
grind Russia down. Additionally, the
anti-Russian sentiment that resulted from a war would strengthen NATO’s resolve.
All of this came to pass as
NATO’s ‘Strategic Windfall’
In the wake of the stalled
counteroffensive, the
In the starkest
demonstration of the lack of concern for
Ignatius is far from alone.
Hawkish Sen. Mitt Romney (R–Utah) explained why US funding for the proxy war
was “about the
best national defense spending I think we’ve ever done”: “We’re losing no lives in
The consensus among policymakers in
‘Fears Of Peace Talks’
Polls show that support for
increased
The failure of the
counteroffensive has not caused
But even within the Biden administration, the
Pentagon appears to be at odds with the State Department and National Security
Council over the
[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
September 17, 2023 © EU and US all rights reserved.
Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it
is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content
licensed under CC-BY
and GFDL.
[Note:
Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the
information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and
events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal
strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being’s right to
know the truth. Due to our mission’s conflicts with that of those governments,
the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding
misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us,
that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note:
The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated
to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer
experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to
counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003
invasion of Iraq.]
[Note:
The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in
this report refers to Russian citadels, including in
Feared
By Demonic Socialists “Apostle Of Pay Back” Leaders Stand Astride World
Mysterious
“Axis Of Evil”
Deaths Keep Americans In “World Of
Illusion”