World's Largest English Language News Service with Over 500 Articles Updated Daily
"The News You Need Today…For The World You’ll Live In Tomorrow."
July 9, 2020
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A fascinating new Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) report circulating in the Kremlin today noting President Donald Trump blasting the United States Supreme Court last month over a couple of rulings they made that caused him to post on social media: “These horrible & politically charged decisions coming out of the Supreme Court are shotgun blasts into the face of people that are proud to call themselves Republicans or Conservatives…We need more Justices or we will lose our 2nd Amendment & everything else…Vote Trump 2020!”, says the cases causing this angry outburst were the Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California and Macy v. Holder—the first of which was actually a Trump win, as this high court ruled he could end the DACA programme for illegal migrants, he just had to do it a different way—while the second one granting anti-discrimination rights to LGBTQ employees, saw this high court then wiping these rights out again yesterday—a day that saw this high court first ruling in the case Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania that the US government can’t force religious organizations to pay for birth control or abortions for their employees—and in the second case Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru, saw this high court making the historic ruling that religious organizations can label any of their employees as “ministers” to make them immune from employment discrimination lawsuits—a ruling based on the First Amendment to the United States Constitution that says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”—and whose greatest significance of this historic ruling means that any company in America wishing to, can become a religious organization in order to make itself immune from government persecution—that one can liken to a religious castle able to withstand a socialist siege—and couldn’t come at a better time, as socialist forces are now branding everyone a racist bigot unless they can prove they’ve had sex with EVERY gender. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
According to this report, in order for one to grasp the full historic significance of the Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru ruling handed down yesterday by the United States Supreme Court, they must first revisit the 2012 ruling made by this high court in the case Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission—that created the landmark doctrine known as the “ministerial exception”, which barred ministers from suing churches and other religious institutions for employment discrimination, and prohibited a lawsuit filed by a teacher at a Lutheran school who was also an ordained minister.
In the Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru case ruled on yesterday, this report details, it was forced to the Supreme Court by the radical leftist US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, that reinstated two teachers’ lawsuits because it reasoned that the “ministerial exception” only applies when an employee plays a “religious leadership” role, with these leftist judges saying they that teachers Kristen Biel and Agnes Morrissey-Berru played a more limited role, mostly “teaching religion from a book”—but in slapping down these leftist judges, saw Justice Samuel Alito, in his ruling majority final order, saying that “the First Amendment bars the government from interfering in the right of churches and other religious institutions to decide issues relating to their faith and doctrine”—his further stating that “religious institutions should be able to make their own decisions about how they are run, including the selection of the individuals who play certain key roles”—and his ruling that “religious institutions should be able to both choose and, if necessary, remove a minister without government interference”— otherwise, Justice Alito observed, “a wayward minister’s preaching, teaching, and counseling could contradict the church’s tenets and lead the congregation away from the faith”—a majority ruling joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, who filed a concurring opinion that was joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch saying that “if a religious organization labels an employee a minister, courts should defer to that designation”.
With this historic Supreme Court ruling now granting “ministerial exception” protection to all of the employees of religious organizations, thus making them immune from discrimination lawsuits and/or government harassment, this report concludes, it’s important to know what a religious organization is under US federal law—the legal definition of which is in what is called the IRS Fourteen Points, that are: 1. Distinct legal existence; 2. Recognized creed and form of worship; 3. Definite and distinct ecclesiastical government; 4. Formal code of doctrine and discipline; 5. Distinct religious history; 6. A membership not associated with any other church or denomination; 7. An organization of ordained ministers; 8. Ordained ministers selected after completing prescribed studies; 9. Literature of its own; 10. Established places of worship; 11. Regular congregations; 12. Regular religious services; 13. Sunday schools for religious instruction of the young; 14. Schools for the preparation of its ministers—all 14-points of which are more than met by the oldest protestant Christian religious organization in the world known as the Baptists—all of whom are strict followers of the Bible verse found in the New Testament Book of Matthew that says: “For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.”—and because of these Baptists strictly adhering to this verse, makes them the world’s largest creator of what is known as the “House Church”—more commonly known in America as a “Home Church”, that describes a group of Christians who regularly gather for worship in private homes and/or businesses as part of a larger Christian body—are seen throughout Communist China where Christians are violently persecuted if discovered—and whose House Church movement in America now sees it being bigger than the United States’ 2nd largest Christian denomination—all of whose religious organization members are now protected with the powerful “ministerial exception”—to include whatever businesses they conduct their House Church services in—and includes the over 1,800 companies in America that have designated themselves as Christian religious organizations—one of the largest being the devout Christian craft homemaking retail giant Hobby Lobby—all of whose employees have now been designated by the US Supreme Court as “ministers”—and where one can logically assume no radical godless socialist revolutionaries will be finding jobs at any time soon.
July 9, 2020 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.
[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being’s right to know the truth. Due to our mission’s conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]
The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in
this report refers to Russian citadels, including in