World's Largest English Language News Service with Over 500
Articles Updated Daily
"The News You Need Today…For The World You’ll Live In Tomorrow."
What You Aren’t
Being Told About The World You Live In
How The “Conspiracy Theory” Label Was Conceived To Derail The
Truth Movement
How Covert American Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive and Destroy Reputations
September 22,
2025
World Mourns Loss Of Last
American Who Genuinely Believed You Could Change Someone’s Mind
By: Sorcha Faal,
and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A compelling new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting President Donald Trump issued an ultimatum to all of his NATO allies in Europe last week, ordering them stop buying Russian oil, seize frozen Russian assets and sanction China and India for buying Russian oil, says he also warned in his ultimatum: “This is not TRUMP’S WAR, it is Biden’s and Zelenskyy’s WAR...I am only here to help stop it, and save thousands of Russian and Ukrainian lives...If NATO does as I say, the WAR will end quickly, and all of those lives will be saved!...If not, you are just wasting my time, and the time, energy, and money of the United States”.
In response to the ultimatum issued by President Trump, this report notes, yesterday it saw European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen rejecting Trump’s order to place sanctions on China and India—French President Emmanuel Macron rejected Trump’s order to seize frozen Russian assets warning: “When some countries start to disrespect international laws this is the beginning of a total chaos”—and European Commissioner for Economy and Productivity Valdis Dombrovskis announced in defiance of Trump’s order: “The new package of EU anti-Russian sanctions will not include restrictions on the purchase of oil from Russia”.
While being openly defied by all of his NATO allies in Europe, this report continues, President Trump announced plans to designate what he described as a “vast domestic terror movement” threatening American safety as terrorist organizations—an announcement joined by FBI Director Kash Patel informing the American peoples yesterday: “As the Director of the FBI, I am committed to ensuring the investigation into Charlie Kirk’s assassination is thorough and exhaustive, pursuing every lead to its conclusion...The full weight of America’s law enforcement agencies are actively following the evidence that has emerged, but our efforts extend beyond initial findings...We are examining every facet of this assassination...We are meticulously investigating theories and questions, including the location from where the shot was taken, the possibility of accomplices, the text message confession and related conversations, Discord chats, the angle of the shot and bullet impact, how the weapon was transported, hand gestures observed as potential “signals” near Charlie at the time of his assassination, and visitors to the alleged shooter’s residence in the hours and days leading up to September 10, 2025”.
As over 100,000 peoples gathered in person and tens-of-millions from all around the world watched the memorial service for Christian martyr Charlie Kirk yesterday, this report details, it was also revealed: “A report from Decision Desk HQ (DDHQ) released this week suggested that Gen Z appears to be charting a different political course than Millennials...The DDHQ analysis indicated Democrats had lost ground among young voters in voter registration, particularly young men, during the 2024 cycle...The same report showed that, while Democratic registration among young white women remained consistent with historical norms at 47 percent, Democratic registration among young white men, historically around 49 percent, had fallen to 29 percent...The report also found modest losses among young nonwhite women”.
In analyzing the effect the brutal assassination death of Christian martyr Charlie Kirk will have on young American
voters, this report concludes, world-renowned American elder statesman William Bennett,
in his just released open letter “What Charlie Kirk’s Murder Tells Us About The American Mind”,
warningly observed:
"The best lack all
conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity".
William Butler Yeats wrote
those words about
The young man who built an empire of discourse
from a suburban garage has been silenced by someone who apparently found
bullets more persuasive than words.
But here is what strikes me
as I reflect on this tragedy: Charlie Kirk may have been
the last American who genuinely believed you could change someone's mind with a
good argument.
Think about that. When was the last time you saw someone actually
switch positions during a debate? When
did you last witness someone say three of the most treasured words in the
English language: "I was wrong?"
My younger son understood
this belief. He called me after Kirk’s
death and shared something that possibly captured our national descent. "Dad", he said, "I used to be like Charlie Kirk— I used to think
people could be persuaded with reason".
My son learned otherwise
during the 2016 election, while in graduate school. He started getting several calls a day from
classmates wanting to understand how he could support someone they genuinely
believed was the modern-day equivalent of Hitler. These graduate students—educated, intelligent
people pursuing MBAs—literally thought Trump was on par with Hitler and were
calling my son because they could not reconcile how someone like him could
support such evil.
So, in good faith, he
engaged everyone who contacted him. From
his own account: "I came to business school to learn things like accounting, not
to practice defending myself from being called a Nazi. I lost friends through this period, and it
ended up being one of the hardest times of my life".
Let me advance an
unconventional thesis: Charlie Kirk died because
we have forgotten how to hate properly.
G.K. Chesterton observed
that "the true
soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he
loves what is behind [or next to] him". We
fight not for hatred of our enemies but love of our fellow soldiers and the
ideals of our country.
We have inverted this wisdom. We teach our young people to hate their
opponents rather than love their own principles. We have made politics a blood sport precisely
because we have drained it of transcendent meaning. When you believe in nothing greater than your
own righteousness, the only thing left is to destroy those who challenge your
certainty.
As my son lost friends, he
did something quite understandable.
Shortly after Trump's election, he stopped actively participating in
politics—watching the news, talking about it with friends, and reading the
articles he used to read daily. "I found myself getting
physically uncomfortable when the news came on", he told me. "Defending yourself against being called a Nazi,
racist, sexist, endlessly just for communicating relatively common-sense ideas
like boys go to the boys' bathroom and girls go to the girls' bathroom, or that
throwing Molotov cocktails into police cars is a bad idea (something a
classmate of his actually did during the George Floyd protests) just gets
really draining after a while".
My son learned a hard,
unfortunate lesson during graduate school, one countless other students have
learned in recent years. The modern
university, where Kirk met his end, has become the opposite of what John Henry
Newman envisioned when he wrote "The Idea of
a University". Newman imagined institutions where "a habit of mind is formed
which lasts through life, of which the attributes are freedom, equitableness,
calmness, moderation, and wisdom".
Instead, we have created factories of fragility,
where students pay $70,000 a year to have their prejudices confirmed and their
triggers avoided.
The founders would have
recognized Charlie immediately.
Here is another
unconventional thought: The problem is not that our universities are too
political. They are not political in the
classical sense of "political" that Aristotle meant when he
called man a political animal. The university problem is that they are factories of
indoctrination, especially in the liberal arts.
Real politics requires engagement with difference, the ability to live
alongside those you disagree with, the skill of persuasion rather than
coercion. Our campuses
have replaced politics with theology, and a particularly intolerant theology at
that.
My son concluded his
reflection with words that haunt me: "In those moments, having made the wrong choice at
that juncture many times before, I hope I have the conviction and bravery to live
it like Charlie and live it like Bill". He
meant Charlie Kirk, of course. The other
Bill he referenced was his father — me.
I am humbled by the comparison but troubled by his confession. While he admittedly tossed his hat out of the
ring, and entered the non-political world of finance, he has found his comfort
and happiness. But at what cost to our
society?
This is what we have done
to our young people. We have made the cost of conviction so high that capable,
principled people retreat from public engagement entirely. We have created a world where it is safer to
be silent than to speak, safer to conform than to question, safer to hide than
to stand. There is a certain relief in that. But it does not come without a cost.
The question before us is
not whether we will have more Charlie Kirks—young people willing to brave
hostility for their beliefs. We
will. The question is whether we will
have more like my son—capable people who retreat from public engagement because
the cost has become too high. Few of the
brightest people I know dream of entering politics—they dream of venture
capital, private equity, the places where talent can still flourish without
ideological inquisition. It makes brutal
sense: Make enough money, and perhaps you can affect the change you want to see
in society, safely insulated from the mob.
If we cannot make
In its literal etymological
sense, democracy means "power of the people"—today it feels more like power of the perpetually
aggrieved. If you are not consumed with
rage, you are at home raising your family and going to work. So radical political
movements naturally attract the angriest among us, not necessarily the wisest.
Charlie Kirk is dead at 31,
but the idea he represented—that Americans can argue their way to truth rather
than shoot their way to silence—must not die with
him.
My son's generation deserves better than the
choice between silence and death.
They deserve what Charlie
Kirk tried to give them: a place at the table, a voice in the conversation, and
the right to speak without being murdered for it. Our children and grandchildren deserve it.
[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
September 22, 2025 © EU and US all rights reserved.
Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it
is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content
licensed under CC-BY
and GFDL.
[Note:
Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the
information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and
events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal
strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being’s right to
know the truth. Due to our mission’s conflicts with that of those governments,
the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding
misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like
us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note:
The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated
to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer
experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to
counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003
invasion of Iraq.]
[Note:
The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in
this report refers to Russian citadels, including in
Trump
Vows Use Of “Harsh Measures” To Free Innocent Patriot Tortured In “Feral City”
State
Trump
Launches Historic “Feral City” Blitzkrieg To Decide
Fate Of America