World's Largest English Language News Service with Over 500
Articles Updated Daily
"The News You Need Today…For The World
You’ll Live In Tomorrow."
What You Aren’t
Being Told About The World You Live In
How
The “Conspiracy Theory” Label Was Conceived To Derail The Truth Movement
How Covert American Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive and Destroy Reputations
June 18, 2025
By: Sorcha Faal,
and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A thought-provoking new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting the Foreign Ministry issued the grave warning: “The ongoing intensive attacks by the Israeli side on peaceful nuclear facilities in Iran are illegal from the point of view of international law, create unacceptable threats to international security and push the world towards a nuclear catastrophe”, says this grave warning was joined by Director Rafael Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency truthfully informing the world: “What we reported was that we did not have any proof of a systematic effort by Iran to move toward a nuclear weapon...The agency’s findings align with other independent sources on the issue”.
Among the other independent sources aligning with the International Atomic Energy Agency in assessing that Iran is not building nuclear weapons, this report notes, its top President Donald Trump war official Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who informed the United States Congress on 25 March: “We continue to assess Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and that Khamenei has not reauthorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003”.
In response to Director of National Intelligence Gabbard truthfully assessing on behalf of the United States Intelligence Community that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, this report continues, President Trump proclaimed: “I don’t care what she said…I think they were very close to having one”—and it was revealed yesterday: “The White House said President Donald Trump and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard are closely aligned on Iran”.
Among those noticing the impossibility of President Trump being closely aligned with Director of National Intelligence Gabbard, as she says Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and he says they are, this report details, was the leftist New York Times, that factually observed: “The contradictory comments have left a trail of confusion as Israelis, Iranians, and the broader Middle East try to understand whether the biggest conflict between Israel and Iran in history would escalate further and whether Mr. Trump, long opposed to foreign wars, would plunge the United States into one”—and was a factual observation swiftly followed by Vice President J.D. Vance posting the message to the American peoples:
Look, I'm seeing this from
the inside, and am admittedly biased towards our president (and my friend), but
there's a lot of crazy stuff on social media, so I wanted to address some
things directly on the
First, POTUS has been
amazingly consistent, over 10 years, that
Second, I've seen a lot of
confusion over the issue of "civilian nuclear power" and
"uranium enrichment." These
are distinct issues.
It's one thing to want civilian
nuclear energy. It's another thing to
demand sophisticated enrichment capacity.
And it's still another to cling to enrichment while simultaneously
violating basic non-proliferation obligations and enriching right to the point
of weapons-grade uranium.
I have yet to see a single
good argument for why
Meanwhile, the president
has shown remarkable restraint in keeping our military's focus on protecting
our troops and protecting our citizens.
He may decide he needs to take
further action to end Iranian enrichment.
That decision ultimately belongs to the president.
And of course, people are right to be worried
about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy.
But I believe the president
has earned some trust on this issue. And
having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only
interested in using the American military to accomplish the American people's
goals. Whatever he does, that is his
focus.
Joining Vice President Vance admitting that the war isn’t about Iran building nuclear weapons, but is all about their processing levels of nuclear materials legally allowed and watched over daily by International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors, this report notes, was the news: “According to a new YouGov poll, conducted June 13 to June 16, a majority of Americans think the United States should not get involved in Israel’s war with Iran, signaling trouble for the midterms if President Trump decides to send troops into the conflict...The opposition to U.S. involvement includes 65% of Democrats, 61% of Independents, and 53% of Republicans”.
As President Trump prepares to embroil the United States in yet another forever war the vast majority of Americans oppose, this report continues, Iran announced today: “In the most intense phase of Operation True Promise III so far, Iranian long-range missiles tore through multiple layers of Israeli air defenses in the early hours of Wednesday, striking and destroying targets across Israel”—and an Israeli Telegram channel, while sharing a video of Iranian missiles hitting their targets, wrote: “Watch and count the number of interceptor missiles fired by the air defense system, and at the end of the video, you’ll see the Iranian missile bypass them and hit its targets”.
Among those suffering under the rain of Iranian missiles decimating
The war is five days old, and, like most Israelis,
we are getting about as much sleep as the parents of a newborn, roused twice a
night and running to our shelter. There,
our condo neighbors gather, bantering through the newscasts, damp and in doubt.
On those newscasts, as on
television nightly, panels of security pundits, themselves mostly former
generals and Mossad agents, are good with numbers and not particularly so at
hiding their pride.
For our part, us civilians
are exhorted to Stoicism, “kor ruach,” “composure.” This, we are told, is what existential war
feels like. “Jews know better than
anyone,” an otherwise pokerfaced Channel Twelve correspondent declaims, “that
when somebody says he means to kill you, you have to believe them — and relieve
them of their means to do so.” As I
write, I can hear squadrons of Israeli Air Force fighters in the skies, heading
east in waves. Soon enough, new missiles will fly, and I’m preparing to be
composed.
Indeed, those of us who’ve
followed the diplomatic twists in the region since the 1960s feel mostly out of
our depth. It has been our job to
consider motivation on both sides: histories, ideologies, grievances.
For our security experts,
in contrast, analysis may entail an assessment of, yes, an enemy’s motivation,
but only in tandem with its military capability; and then, motivation boils
down to military capability, because, “Jews know,” if enemies have the
capability to hurt you, they will have the motivation to do so. The inference for action is preemption,
deterrence, intimidation. Discussion of
diplomatic alternatives to “kinetic action” is vaguely effete.
Perhaps this is my own failure of imagination, but
I am not so sure that this is what existential war feels like. Anyway, I have questions — worse, I cannot
see how, given our experts’ preemptive logic, this war ends.
Let us concede that, for
Shame on me, but I always
imagined that an attack to preempt
What I did not imagine was that
Nor did I imagine that the
regime’s missile construction capacity itself, leadership, chain-of-command,
scientists, oil facilities — all of these — would qualify as targeted
infrastructure. Or, that in the course of a presumably preemptive war, Iranian missiles would themselves prove more seriously
menacing than the atom bombs they would hypothetically (and almost certainly
never) deliver. Now, given this
inescapable conclusion, does not
What have we learned from the past four days,
after all? Just from missiles, 24 people
in
The big question, in other
words, is whether Netanyahu has not set his sights on regime change. Whether his sights have not been blinkered by
a new logic deriving from the manifest results of his own escalation — that
Iran’s nuclear program and missile program are one; that given the danger to
Israel merely from the missiles, leaving the Ayatollah’s regime in charge
itself amounts to an existential threat.
Most vexing of all, why,
under these circumstances, should the Iranian regime stop the war? It says it will be prepared to put enrichment
back under international monitoring, as under the previous nuclear deal. But, for now, why capitulate?
Why not launch a dozen missiles every night, or
every third night, keeping Israeli business depressed, our airspace closed, our
sleep foiled — and watch us squirm? Why
not tie up virtually the entire Israeli Air Force looking for missile
development in a territory the size of
Finally, will Bibi, of all
people, the leader in charge of Gazan carnage, bring Iranians to overthrow
their government?
All of this, I suppose, does indeed toss the ball
to Donald Trump. But has he ever played this position before —
is he able to see more than one move ahead, and doesn’t that move have to
enhance his personal popularity? This
week, Bibi, and the Israeli military more generally, are the winners he wants
to take credit for. But next week? What if the Iranian regime just hangs tough
and keeps the war going? Does
Israel, in short, may have taken a five-foot leap
over a six-foot pit. The country has always been good at surprise
attacks, one former Israeli general put it, but less so at sustained
resistance. And counting on Trump to
help — say, by bombing Fordow, or trying to extract a “better deal,” or new
sanctions, or all three — assumes, first, that he’ll be able to see how Israel
has fallen into a trap set by its own audacious strike, and, second, that he’ll
see an advantage in committing American forces, and risking oil infrastructure
in the Gulf states, to release Israel from that trap.
Trump may help, if that’s
the word. He is warning Iranians to
“evacuate
I am no longer sure what to hope for, except for
the madness to be, well, trumped by quick movement to the regional settlement
that’s been dangled by the Saudis since the Gaza war began — a forlorn hope,
perhaps.
In any case, questions, not
just sirens, are enough to keep us up at night.
[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
June 18, 2025 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report
in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original
source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.
[Note:
Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the
information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and
events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal
strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being’s right to know
the truth. Due to our mission’s conflicts with that of those governments, the
responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding
misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like
us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note:
The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated
to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer
experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to
counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003
invasion of Iraq.]
[Note:
The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in
this report refers to Russian citadels, including in
Trump
Confronts Demons Poisoning America Into Extinction
Trump
Slams “Treason At The Highest Level”
After Stopping World War III