World's Largest English Language News Service with Over 500 Articles Updated Daily

"The News You Need Today…For The World You’ll Live In Tomorrow."

What You Aren’t Being Told About The World You Live In

How The “Conspiracy Theory” Label Was Conceived To Derail The Truth Movement

How Covert American Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive and Destroy Reputations

November 18, 2024

Trump Confirms Military National Emergency After Biden Tries To Start World War III

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

A foreboding new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting President Donald Trump, at 4:03 a.m EST this morning, confirmed he will declare a national emergency and mobilize the American military for mass deportations of illegal aliens, says this followed the Axios news service revealing: “The United States has communicated President Joe Biden’s decision to fire long-range US weapons against Russian territory to Ukraine...The Biden administration let Kiev know about its decision around three days ago...These weapons were authorized for use in the Kursk Region only”.

Quickly following the revelation that President Biden authorized long-range missile strikes into Russia, this report notes, unelected usurper Ukrainian Dictator Vladimir Zelensky warned: “Strikes are not carried out with words...Such things are not announced...Missiles will speak for themselves...They certainly will”—a warning joined by European Union Parliament Member Florian Philippot most factually assessing: “By authorizing such strikes, the deep state and its puppet Biden are trying to trigger World War III before Trump comes to power...We expected this kind of thing: their madness knows no bounds!”.

In knowing that Ukraine can only launch long-range missile strikes into Russia using NATO satellites and military technicians, this report continues, top Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov declared: “If conducted, such strikes would mean that NATO nations are at war with Russia”—top Russian Senator Vladimir Dzhabarov warned: “This is a very big step towards the start of World War III”—and top Russian psychic Kazhetta Akhmetzhanova predicted: “At the moment, an extremely dangerous period is coming, which will last for several months...The situation is very difficult at the moment...It is not by chance that world leaders have started calling our President, they understand that the world is on the brink...And that if they cross a certain line, terrible things can happen...Warmongers are now in agony: they realize that they will soon have to answer to the full extent of the law”.

Following Donald Trump Jr. posting the warning message: “The Military Industrial Complex seems to want to make sure they get World War 3 going before my father has a chance to create peace and save lives...Gotta lock in those $Trillions...Life be damned!!!...Imbeciles!”, this report details, it was grimly revealed: “Sweden on Monday began sending some five million pamphlets to residents urging them to prepare for the possibility of war, as neighbouring Finland launched a new preparedness website”.

While NATO members Sweden and Finland prepare their peoples for World War III, this report concludes, NATO military leader German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius announced: “The German government has no intention of approving the supply of long-range cruise missiles to Ukraine for strikes inside Russia”—an announcement joined with the news: “The French daily Le Figaro has walked back its claim that France and the UK have allowed Ukraine to use long-range missiles they have supplied to strike targets deep inside Russian territory”—and former top British diplomat Ian Proud, in his just released open letter “Why Putin Won’t Go Nuclear Following ATACMS Decision”, assessed:

Many western commentators are frantically predicting the imminent onset of World War III following Joe Biden's decision to permit the use of US ATACMS missiles inside of Russia.

The Russian media and political establishment will undoubtedly respond furiously to this move. But much depends on how the missiles are used. With a Trump Presidency on the horizon on a mandate to end the war in Ukraine, I believe Putin will be measured in his response.

Unlike in 2016, there has been fairly widespread condemnation from supporters of Trump at Biden's move, which has been viewed as a blatant escalation. Donald Trump Junior went to X to claim the Biden administration was trying to 'get World War 3 going before my father has a chance to create peace and save lives'.

Other Republican politicians including Senator Mike Lee of Utah and Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene in Georgia have echoed the World War 3 warning. Venture Capitalist and Trump Support David Sacks asked if Biden's goal was 'to hand Trump the worst situation possible?'

Biden's move was designed to make the diplomatic terrain harder for Trump to navigate on Ukraine policy.

Putin will view it in those terms too.

He will remember that President Obama pulled a similar - though less dangerous - stunt during this final days in office. In one of his final foreign policy moves Obama announced sanctions against Russia for alleged election meddling, and expelled 35 Russian diplomats from the USA. This prompted a frenzy of reporting about how Putin might respond, much like we have seen over the past twenty-four hours. In the end, Putin chose not to response and, instead, he paused to see where US policy would go under the incoming administration President Trump.

Biden's decision is an extension of the decision from May to allow limited use of US HIMARS systems to fire into the borderlands of Russia to reduce attacks on Kharkiv at military targets only. Zelensky won't have weapons free to strike at will within Russia. While escalatory, it is not as significant as it seems.

The indications coming out of the US administration are that the ATACMS missiles may only be used to quell an expected major Russian assault on Ukrainian formations dug in the Kursk oblast.

Ukraine has lost around half of the territory in Kursk that it occupied during its audacious raid in August. Clinging on to that territory until peace talks inevitably happen to end the war, Zelensky has said, will allow him symbolically to trade Russian land for Ukrainian land occupied by Russia. Since the Kursk offensive, Ukraine has lost more land to the relentless, grinding Russian advance in the Donbas, which takes small steps most days. Losing the foothold in Kursk will reveal what many commentators already point out, that the Ukrainian incursion was a strategic blunder by Zelensky that won't change the outcome of a war he is losing. So, a US decision to permit the use of ATACMS at best is an attempt by the Biden Administration to help Zelensky save face.

With the use of ATACMS entirely dependent on US intelligence and targeting, it is unlikely that the outgoing Biden administration will permit wider attacks outside of the Kursk theatre or in military centres that are in range of Kursk. However, we have yet to see how the missiles will be used and Putin will take his cue from that, rather than acting pre-emptively.

However, and despite the use of HIMARS already inside of Russia, Putin will have to reciprocate in some way, having said on screen in St Petersburg in September that he would. He doesn't have the political space not to act.

Putin knows that a major Russian retaliation that targeted US military or other assets would make it far harder for Trump to sue for peace between Russia and Ukraine, as he has promised to do. I assess it unlikely that Putin would escalate to a nuclear level on the back of what is essentially a tactical change in western weapons' use. He won't want to close off any space that Trump has to negotiate, which is Biden's aim in taking the ATACMS decision.

While he has the resources and political support to continue bleeding Ukraine white, the war in Ukraine still comes at a significant economic and human cost to Russia. Trump offers a potential off-ramp that would leave Putin in a better position that he was in March 2022, when the US and UK blocked the Istanbul peace agreement.

As happened in late 2016, Putin will undoubtedly encourage Russian talking heads to sow panic in the western media about a Russian over-escalation. That will give him space to respond in a moderate way and illuminate the western press as hysterical and Russophobic, a common attack line.

More likely, he will:

up strategic attacks on energy infrastructure in Ukraine;

possibly target NATO weapons' distribution hubs in Poland;

make a limited and pre-signaled strike on a US military facility in Europe or elsewhere.

There are signals that the UK and France are following America's move in possibly authorising the use of Storm Shadow and Scalp Cruise Missiles inside of Russia. I believe the same limitations on targeting would apply, as above. The same risks of a limited Russian strike on UK and French assets therefore apply.

However, the bigger risk is that a Trump Administration will reverse the decision on ATACMS use inside of Russia, leaving both countries on a limb in which Ukraine still hits Russia with their weapons while Trump pushes for peace talks between Zelensky and Putin.

That will mean France and Britain have a bigger climb down from their position of unquestioning support for war in Ukraine, when ceasefire talks start. In Britain in particular, that may increase pressure on the government's enormous spending on supporting the ongoing war, at a time when taxes are taking a massive hike and the cost of living crisis continues. There is more scope for France to pivot its position within the EU, which will be unable to match US financial military support for Ukraine if Trump pushes, instead for peace.

Keir Starmer has already got off to a bad start with Trump by sending Labour party activists to support the Harris campaign. He risks leaving the UK increasingly isolated and irrelevant on Ukraine policy.

For now, don't expect World War III to start overnight. Keep calm and carry on pressing for this mindless war to end.

[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

November 18, 2024 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being’s right to know the truth. Due to our mission’s conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]

[Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]

[Note: The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in this report refers to Russian citadels, including in Moscow, having cathedrals wherein female Schema monks (Orthodox nuns) reside, many of whom are devoted to the mission of the Sisters of Sorcha Faal.]

Trump-Rogan “Temporal Marker” Interview Began 39 Day Countdown To “Major Sky Event”

Don’t Cry Cryo To Aid “Wet Streets Cause Rain” Leftist American Believers

Return To Main Page