World's Largest English Language News Service with Over 500 Articles Updated Daily
"The News You Need Today…For The World You’ll Live In Tomorrow."
August 15, 2023
Banana Republic Biden Fires Kill Shots At Trump-Kennedy
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A very concerning new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting President Putin observing to participants and guests attending the 11th Moscow Conference on International Security: “We are seeing consistent movement toward the emergence of a multipolar world order…Most countries are prepared to stand up for their sovereignty, national interests, traditions, culture and way of life”, says accelerating the movement towards a multipolar world order are the growing fears over how dangerous the United States has become, as best exampled by top Democrat Party presidential candidate Robert Kennedy Jr., who gravely warned yesterday: “We have biolabs in Ukraine because we are developing bioweapons...Those bioweapons are using all kinds of new synthetic biology and CRISPR technology and genetic engineering techniques that were not available to a previous generation”.
The grave warning about the
With American banana republic potentate Supreme Socialist Leader Joe Biden firing an obvious kill shot at Robert Kennedy Jr. by denying him Secret Service protection, this report continues, late last evening he fired another political kill shot sham indictment at his main rival President Donald Trump, after which it was quickly noted: “Twice-failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate and national Democrat celebrity Stacey Abrams is still free as of Monday, despite having maintained for years that her 2018 race was stolen — a claim for which former President Donald Trump has been indicted”.
Immediately following the latest sham indictment of President Trump, this report details, it was factually observed: “Critics noted that the 41-count indictment (which include 13 counts against Trump) accuses the defendants of crimes for simply arguing that the 2020 presidential election was flawed…That, in turn implicates the First Amendment right to free speech and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel…The indictment also attempts to use a county court in Georgia to charge the defendants for crimes allegedly committed on a national scale and in violation of a federal election, which typically fall under federal jurisdiction”, and factually assessed: “The indictment does not fundamentally concern actions taken in Georgia, but describes words spoken and actions taken by the Trump campaign in a variety of other states in their efforts to cast doubt on the controversial 2020 presidential election...The indictment charges several defendants with crimes merely for making statements that argued the 2020 election was stolen…It claims that actions such as holding public hearings in Pennsylvania amounted to acts in furtherance of an illegal conspiracy”.
Most beyond all belief to notice in last evening’s sham indictment, this report notes, is that President Trump was criminally charged for posting social media messages asking Americans to watch Newsmax, Right Side Broadcasting Network and One America News, which makes it no surprise that article are now appearing like “How Stupid Is The Georgia Anti-Trump Case? They Indicted Trump For Tweeting At People To Watch TV”.
After reading the latest sham indictment of President Trump, this report concludes, world renowned American constitutional expert Professor Alan Dershowitz of Harvard University slammed it for being a transparent attempt to convict President Trump on made up charges that would be thrown out on appeal after the election, and stated: “So if you look back at the 2000 election and the protests, I still think to this day, and I'll say it here on television, that that election was stolen from Al Gore by Bush that he won the actual election…I'm saying that -- are they going to come after me now?”—a statement joined by world renowned Pulitzer Prize winning American investigative journalist Glenn Greenwald observing:
No matter how you slice it... the polls show that there's only one person who's likely to challenge Joe Biden and defeat him for reelection, and that's the person whom Biden's DOJ happens to be prosecuting in multiple cases.
Not just cases that have been brought but ones that rely on highly dubious interpretations of the law.
It's not like these are murder cases, rape cases, bribery cases, or things people traditionally think about when they hear of criminal accusations.
They're very distant and vague accusations that depend a lot on free speech rights, and they will only worsen perceptions that the DOJ can't be trusted.
The first book I wrote in 2005 was an argument that the Bush and Cheney administration had committed obvious war crimes like torture, rendition, and warrantless spying on Americans.
The entire DC class agreed with Obama saying only banana republics prosecute their political opposition, and that was for real crimes like torture, kidnapping, killing people, and spying without warrants. Not these kinds of attenuated theories of criminality on which the Biden DOJ is now relying on to prosecute Trump, their primary political opposition.
At exactly the same time the Biden administration is prosecuting Donald Trump, they are also shielding Hunter Biden, who is guilty of far more blatant and obvious criminality, just blatant political corruption, tax evasion, and hiding assets in a way that most people go to jail for many years.
And Hunter Biden gets this incredibly generous deal that was so shocking to the judge because she couldn't believe that the DOJ was really offering him full-scale immunity, given how many other crimes are pending.
And given how he was allowed to plead guilty to misdemeanors for what she has seen treated as serious felonies.
The relevant metric now isn't left versus right. It's anti-establishment versus pro-establishment.
Namely, do you think the loss of trust that these institutions of authority have suffered is valid or not? Do you think that they deserve the contempt in which they are held by a large portion of the population?
I believe it's absolutely justified to hold them in contempt.
That's the fundamental distinction that defines our political spectrum more than old definitions of left versus right.
[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
August 15, 2023 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.
[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being’s right to know the truth. Due to our mission’s conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]
The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in
this report refers to Russian citadels, including in