World's Largest English Language News Service with Over 500
Articles Updated Daily
"The News You Need Today…For The World
You’ll Live In Tomorrow."
What You Aren’t
Being Told About The World You Live In
How
The “Conspiracy Theory” Label Was Conceived To Derail The Truth Movement
How Covert American Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive and Destroy Reputations
August 15, 2023
Banana Republic Biden Fires Kill Shots At
Trump-Kennedy
By: Sorcha Faal, and
as reported to her Western Subscribers
A very concerning new Security Council (SC) report
circulating in the Kremlin today first noting President Putin observing to participants and guests attending the 11th
Moscow Conference on International Security: “We are seeing consistent
movement toward the emergence of a multipolar world order…Most countries are
prepared to stand up for their sovereignty, national interests, traditions,
culture and way of life”, says accelerating the movement towards a multipolar world order are
the growing fears over how dangerous the United
States has become, as best exampled by top Democrat Party presidential candidate Robert Kennedy Jr., who gravely warned yesterday: “We have biolabs
in Ukraine because we are developing bioweapons...Those bioweapons are using
all kinds of new synthetic biology and CRISPR technology and genetic
engineering techniques that were not available to a previous generation”.
The grave warning about the
With American banana republic potentate Supreme Socialist Leader Joe Biden firing an obvious kill shot at Robert Kennedy Jr. by denying him Secret Service protection, this report
continues, late last evening he fired another political kill shot sham indictment at his main rival President Donald Trump, after which it was quickly noted: “Twice-failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate and national
Democrat celebrity Stacey Abrams is still free as of Monday, despite having
maintained for years that her 2018 race was stolen — a claim for which former
President Donald Trump has been indicted”.
Immediately following the latest
sham indictment of President Trump,
this report details, it was factually observed: “Critics noted that the 41-count indictment (which include 13
counts against Trump) accuses the defendants of crimes for simply arguing that
the 2020 presidential election was flawed…That, in turn implicates the First
Amendment right to free speech and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel…The
indictment also attempts to use a county court in Georgia to charge the
defendants for crimes allegedly committed on a national scale and in violation
of a federal election, which typically fall under federal jurisdiction”, and factually assessed: “The indictment does not fundamentally concern actions taken
in Georgia, but describes words spoken and actions taken by the Trump campaign
in a variety of other states in their efforts to cast doubt on the controversial
2020 presidential election...The indictment charges several defendants with
crimes merely for making statements that argued the 2020 election was stolen…It
claims that actions such as holding public hearings in Pennsylvania amounted to
acts in furtherance of an illegal conspiracy”.
Most beyond all belief to notice in
last evening’s sham indictment, this report notes, is that President Trump was criminally charged for posting social media messages asking
Americans to watch Newsmax, Right Side Broadcasting Network and One America
News, which makes
it no surprise that article are now appearing like “How Stupid Is The Georgia Anti-Trump Case? They Indicted
Trump For Tweeting At People To Watch TV”.
After reading the latest sham
indictment of President Trump, this
report concludes, world renowned American
constitutional expert Professor Alan
Dershowitz of Harvard University
slammed it for being a transparent attempt to convict
President Trump on made up charges that would be thrown out on appeal after the
election, and
stated: “So if you look back at the 2000 election and the protests, I
still think to this day, and I'll say it here on television, that that election
was stolen from Al Gore by Bush that he won the actual election…I'm saying that
-- are they going to come after me now?”—a statement joined by world renowned Pulitzer Prize winning American investigative journalist Glenn Greenwald observing:
No matter how you slice it... the polls show that
there's only one person who's likely to challenge Joe Biden and defeat him for
reelection, and that's the person whom Biden's DOJ happens to be prosecuting in
multiple cases.
Not just cases that have
been brought but ones that rely on highly dubious interpretations of the law.
It's not like these are
murder cases, rape cases, bribery cases, or things people traditionally think
about when they hear of criminal accusations.
They're very distant and vague accusations that
depend a lot on free speech rights, and they will only worsen perceptions that
the DOJ can't be trusted.
The first book I wrote in
2005 was an argument that the Bush and Cheney administration had committed
obvious war crimes like torture, rendition, and warrantless spying on
Americans.
The entire DC class agreed
with Obama saying only banana republics prosecute their political opposition,
and that was for real crimes like torture, kidnapping, killing people, and
spying without warrants. Not these kinds
of attenuated theories of criminality on which the Biden DOJ is now relying on
to prosecute Trump, their primary political opposition.
At exactly the same time the Biden administration
is prosecuting Donald Trump, they are also shielding Hunter Biden, who is
guilty of far more blatant and obvious criminality, just blatant political
corruption, tax evasion, and hiding assets in a way that most people go to jail
for many years.
And Hunter Biden gets this
incredibly generous deal that was so shocking to the judge because she couldn't
believe that the DOJ was really offering him full-scale immunity, given how
many other crimes are pending.
And given how he was
allowed to plead guilty to misdemeanors for what she has seen treated as
serious felonies.
The relevant metric now isn't left versus
right. It's anti-establishment versus
pro-establishment.
Namely, do you think the
loss of trust that these institutions of authority have suffered is valid or
not? Do you think that they deserve the
contempt in which they are held by a large portion of the population?
I believe it's absolutely justified to hold them
in contempt.
That's the fundamental distinction that defines
our political spectrum more than old definitions of left versus right.
[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
August 15, 2023 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this
report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its
original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.
[Note:
Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the
information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and
events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal
strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being’s right to
know the truth. Due to our mission’s conflicts with that of those governments,
the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding
misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like
us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note:
The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and
donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American
computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to
counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003
invasion of Iraq.]
[Note:
The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in
this report refers to Russian citadels, including in
Americans
On “Brink Of Great Disorder” Advised
To “Visualize The Worst”
America
Warned “Hurtling Toward Disaster” As
“Truth Takes A Holiday”