World's Largest English Language News Service with Over 500 Articles Updated Daily
"The News You Need Today…For The World You’ll Live In Tomorrow."
June 15, 2023
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A beyond terrifying new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first notes Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova went on the sidelines of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum this morning to declare: “Russia’s nuclear deterrent policies are purely defensive in nature, and the hypothetical use of nuclear weapons is clearly limited to extraordinary circumstances”—Zakharova explained that those “extraordinary circumstances” could include an attack on Russia or its allies involving nuclear or other weapons of mass destruction, or “a conventional aggression that threatens the very existence of the state”, and stressed: “This fundamental point remains unchanged”— Zakharova went on to reiterate that “Russia is fully committed to the principle that a nuclear war should never be fought”, and observed: “There could be no winners in it”.
To fully comprehend what the top spokesperson for the Russian government said, you need to know the Russian word “avos'”, that describes a philosophy of behavior—in understanding this, it shows Zakharova was reacting to something—in knowing this fact, you next need know academic articles like “Nietzsche And Russian Fatalism”, wherein it notes: “Whether debilitated by a physical illness or overcome by an intense bout with psychological/emotional pain, Nietzsche recommended that one utilize the remedy which he called ‘Russian fatalism’…One who utilizes such a remedy ceases the attempt to cure himself, and simply lies down and accepts his sickness and pain and inhibits any physical or emotional reaction whatsoever…In doing so he conserves precious energy and hastens his recovery”—and you really need to know about academic articles like “Russian Fatalism vs Western Pragmatism In The Russian And English Syntaxes And Literature”, wherein it reveals: “The differences between the English and Russian syntactic structures are not a simple coincidence...They reflect some crucial cultural moments that, possibly, is the cause of global misunderstanding between Westerners and Slavs, the misunderstanding of Slavic fatalism by Western pragmatism...Fatalism is the most global feature of Slavic mentality...Russians often are referred as the ‘crazy nation’; this is purely because deep down they believe that, whatever you do, it is not going to change God’s plan for you or your destiny”.
Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Zakharova was reacting to Russian political scientist Professor Sergey Karaganov, who heads the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy and is the top advisor to President Putin and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov—and specifically, Zakharova was reacting to Professor Karaganov making an “extraordinary circumstances” case in his just released open letter to the Russian peoples entitled “By Using Its Nuclear Weapons, Russia Could Save Humanity From A Global Catastrophe”, wherein he assessed:
Our country, and its leadership, seems to me to be facing a difficult choice. It is becoming increasingly clear that our clash with the West will not end even if we achieve a partial – let alone a crushing – victory in Ukraine.
Even if we completely
The situation could be
worse if we liberate the whole of
Any of these options,
especially the last one, will distract
Meanwhile, hostility from the West will continue; it will support a slow-burning guerrilla civil war.
A more attractive option is
the liberation and reunification of the east and south, and the imposition of
capitulation on the remnants of
And here I come to a crucial but hardly discussed issue. The root cause of – and indeed the main reason for – the Ukrainian crisis, as well as many other conflicts in the world, and the general increase in military threats, is the accelerating failure of the contemporary Western ruling elites.
This crisis is accompanied
by an unprecedentedly rapid shift in the balance of power
in the world in favor of the global majority, driven economically by
This weakening not only infuriates the imperial-cosmopolitan elites (US President Joe Biden and his ilk) but also frightens the imperial-national elites (such as his predecessor Donald Trump).
The West is losing the advantage it has held for five centuries to siphon off the wealth of the entire world by imposing its political and economic order and establishing its cultural dominance, mainly by brute force. So there is no quick end to the defensive, but aggressive, confrontation that the West has unleashed.
This moral, political and
economic collapse has been brewing since the mid-1960s, was interrupted by the
collapse of the
In order to slow down this seismic shift, the West has temporarily consolidated itself.
By failing internally, Western elites have actively fed the weeds that have taken root in the soil of 70 years of prosperity, satiation and peace. These comprise of anti-human ideologies: the denial of family, homeland, history, love between men and women, faith, service to higher ideals, everything that is human. Their philosophy is to weed out those who resist. The aim is to neuter people in order to reduce their ability to resist modern “globalist” capitalism, which is becoming more and more obviously unjust and harmful to man and humanity.
Meanwhile, a weakened US is destroying Western
Europe and other countries dependent on it, trying to push them into a
confrontation that will follow Ukraine. The elites in most
of these countries have lost their bearings and, panicked by the crisis in
their own positions at home and abroad, are dutifully leading their countries
to the slaughter. At the same time,
because of greater failure, a sense of powerlessness, centuries of Russophobia,
intellectual degradation and a loss of strategic culture, their hatred is
almost more intense than that of the
Thus, the trajectory of most Western countries clearly points towards a new fascism, which could be called “liberal” totalitarianism.
In the future, and this is the most important thing, it will only get worse. Truces are possible, but reconciliation is not. Anger and despair will continue to grow in waves and waves. This vector of Western movement is a clear sign of the drift towards the outbreak of World War Three. It has already begun and could erupt into a full-blown conflagration either by accident, or due to the growing incompetence and irresponsibility of the ruling circles of the West.
The introduction of artificial intelligence and the robotization of war increase the risk of unintended escalation. Machines can act outside the control of confused elites.
The situation is aggravated by “strategic parasitism” – in 75 years of relative peace, people have forgotten the horrors of war, have stopped fearing even nuclear weapons. Everywhere, but especially in the West, the instinct for self-preservation has weakened.
I have spent many years studying the history of nuclear strategy and have come to an unequivocal, if unscientific, conclusion. The advent of nuclear weapons is the result of the intervention of the Almighty, who, appalled that mankind had unleashed two world wars within a generation, costing tens of millions of lives, gave us the weapons of Armageddon to show those who had lost their fear of hell that it existed. On that fear rested the relative peace of the last three-quarters of a century.
But now that fear is gone. The unthinkable in terms of previous notions of nuclear deterrence is happening – a group of ruling elites, in a fit of desperate rage, have unleashed a full-scale war in the underbelly of a nuclear superpower.
The fear of atomic escalation must be restored. Otherwise humanity is doomed.
It is not only, and not
even so much, what the future world order will look like that is being decided
in the fields of
By breaking the West’s will in imposing its aggression, we will not only save ourselves and finally free the world from the Western yoke of five centuries, but we will also salvage the whole of humanity. By pushing the West towards catharsis and the abandonment of the hegemony of its elites, we will force it to retreat before a global catastrophe. Humanity will be given a new chance to develop.
Of course, there is an uphill struggle ahead. It is also necessary to solve our own internal problems – to finally get rid of the mindset of Western-centrism and of the Westernizers in the administrative class. Especially the compradors and their peculiar way of thinking. Of course, in this area, the NATO bloc is helping us, unwittingly.
Our 300-year journey around
The confrontation with the
I have often written, and I am not alone in this, that great states without a great idea cease to be such or simply disappear into the void. History is littered with the graves of powers that lost their way. This idea should be created from above and not rely, as fools or lazy people do, on what comes from below. It must correspond to the deepest values and aspirations of the people and, above all, it must take us all forward. But it is the responsibility of the elite and the leadership of the country to formulate it. The delay in putting forward such a vision is unacceptably long.
But for the future to come to pass, the resistance of the forces of the past – i.e. the West – must be overcome. If this is not achieved, there will almost certainly be a full-scale world war. Which will probably be the last of its kind.
And here I come to the most difficult part of this
article. We can keep fighting for another year or two,
or even three, sacrificing thousands and thousands of our best men and grinding
up hundreds of thousands more who are unfortunate enough to fall into the
tragic historical trap of what is now called
However, for this to
happen, Western elites need to rediscover their own lost sense of
self-preservation by understanding that attempts to wear down
The credibility of nuclear
deterrence must be restored by lowering the unacceptably high threshold for the
use of atomic weapons and by moving cautiously but quickly up the ladder of
deterrence-escalation. The first steps
have already been taken through statements to this effect by the president and
other leaders, by beginning to deploy nuclear weapons and their delivery
I have often said and
written that with the right strategy of deterrence and even use, the risk of a
‘retaliatory’ nuclear or other strike on our
territory can be minimized. Only if
there is a madman in the White House who also hates his own country will the US
decide to strike in ‘defense’ of the Europeans and invite retaliation by sacrificing
a hypothetical Boston for a notional Poznan.
The Americans and the Western Europeans are well aware of this, they just prefer not to think about it. We, too, have contributed to this
recklessness with our peace-loving pronouncements. Having studied the history of
Movement down the ladder of containment-escalation should be fairly quick. Given the current direction of the West – and the degradation of most of its elites – each successive decision it makes is more incompetent and ideologically veiled than the last. And, at present, we cannot expect these elites to be replaced by more responsible and reasonable ones. This will only happen after a catharsis, leading to the abandonment of much ambition.
We cannot repeat the ‘Ukrainian scenario’. For a quarter of a century we were not listened to when we warned that NATO enlargement would lead to war; we tried to delay, to “negotiate”. As a result, we ended up in a serious armed conflict. Now the price of indecision is an order of magnitude higher than it would have been earlier.
But what if the present Western leaders refuse to back down? Perhaps they have lost all sense of self-preservation? Then we will have to hit a group of targets in a number of countries to bring those who have lost their senses back to their senses.
It’s a morally frightening choice – we would be
using God’s weapon and condemning ourselves to great spiritual loss. But if this is not done, not only may
We will have to make this choice ourselves. Even friends and sympathizers will not support it at first. If I were Chinese, I would not want an abrupt and decisive end to the conflict, because it will draw back US forces and allow them to gather forces for a decisive battle – either directly or, in the best Sun Tzu tradition, by forcing the enemy to retreat without a fight. As a Chinese person, I would also oppose the use of nuclear weapons because taking the confrontation to the nuclear level means moving to an area where my country is still weak.
Also, decisive action is
not in line with the Chinese foreign policy philosophy, which emphasizes
economic factors (with the accumulation of military power) and avoids direct
confrontation. I would support an ally
by providing him with rear cover, but I would go behind his back and not enter
the fray. (In this case, perhaps I don’t understand this philosophy well enough
and am attributing motives to my Chinese friends that are not their own.) If
we react if (God forbid!)
But in the end, the victors are not judged. And the saviors are thanked. Western European political culture does not remember, but the rest of the world does (and with gratitude) how we helped the Chinese to free themselves from the brutal Japanese occupation, and many Western colonies to throw off the colonial yoke.
Of course, if they do not understand us at first, they will have all the more incentive to educate themselves. Still, it is very likely that we can win, and focus the minds enemy states without extreme measures, and force them to retreat. And after a few years, we take up a position as China’s rear, as it is now performing for us, supporting it in its struggle with the US. Then this fight can be avoided without a big war. And we will win together for the good of all, including the people of the Western countries.
At that stage, Russia and the rest of humanity will pass through all the thorns and traumas into the future, which I see as bright – multipolar, multicultural, multicolored – and giving countries and peoples the opportunity to build their own destinies in addition to the common one, which should unite worldwide.
[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
June 15, 2023 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.
[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being’s right to know the truth. Due to our mission’s conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]
The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in
this report refers to Russian citadels, including in