World's Largest English Language News Service with Over 500
Articles Updated Daily
"The News You Need Today…For The World
You’ll Live In Tomorrow."
What You
Aren’t Being Told About The World You Live In
How
The “Conspiracy Theory” Label Was Conceived To Derail The Truth Movement
How Covert American Agents Infiltrate the Internet to
Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations
January 2, 2018
American-Leftists Warned Trump-Russia Plot Smear Has Failed
As Shocking Information Set For Release
By: Sorcha Faal, and as
reported to her Western Subscribers
An astonishing new Security Council (SC) report
circulating in the Kremlin today states that the American-leftist establishment (“Deep State”/Obama-Clinton Supporters/Mainstream Media)—who for over a year
have tried to destroy President Donald
Trump through a plot to smear him as a “tool”
of Russia—are now
being warned that all of their lies have now been exposed—and that comes on
the heels of shocking
new revelations soon to be released exposing the main perpetrators of this plot—and
as, also, the US Congress has now
turned its focus away from investigating Trump-Russia
collusion, to where it always rightfully belonged in the first place—the Obama-Clinton regimes use of the FBI and Justice Department to target a political opponent. [Note: Some words
and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language
approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
According to this report, on 10 January 2017,
fully 10-days before President Trump
was sworn into office, the greatest crisis in modern American political history erupted when the leftist publication BuzzFeed News published
what has now become known as the Trump-Russia
Dossier—that alleged cooperation between Trump’s campaign and Russia
to interfere in the 2016 US presidential election to defeat Hillary Clinton.
Not known to the American people about the Trump-Russia
Dossier, though, this report explains, is that it, also, alleged that Hillary Clinton and Democratic Party computers were broken
into with the aid of companies owned by Russian
technology billionaire Aleksej
Gubarev—who immediately
sued BuzzFeed and its editor Ben Smith for publishing these lies
calling it “perhaps one of the most reckless and irresponsible moments in
modern journalism”—and
that, within hours of this lawsuit's filing, saw BuzzFeed blacking
out the name of Aleksej Gubarev from
the Trump-Russian Dossier on its
site and apologizing to him—with BuzzFeed
spokesman Matt Mittenthal stating: “We
have redacted Mr. Gubarev's name
from the published dossier, and apologize for including it.”
Aleksej
Gubarev in his suing BuzzFeed and its editor Ben Smith, this report details, filed
lawsuits against them in US Federal
Courts in Florida and Washington D.C., as well as in London—but that the US mainstream propaganda media has
suppressed nearly all knowledge of over their fears of what the American people would discover—but
whom, just weeks ago, were dealt a stunning blow to their forced silence when
the President Trump-appointed US Federal Judge Trevor McFadden took
over the Washington D.C. portion of
this massive lawsuit.
On 11 December 2017, this report says, the Obama-appointed Washington D.C. US Federal Judge Tanya Chutkan overseeing Aleksej Gubarev’s lawsuit against BuzzFeed and its editor Ben Smith suddenly,
and without explanation, recused herself—which was her
second recusal in a month as in November, she took herself off another case
she was overseeing against the Trump-Russia
Dossier creator Fusion GPS—with
that case then
being taken over by the Bush-appointed
Washington D.C. US Federal Judge Richard
Leon—who immediately stated that he was planning
to allow more transparency into the court proceedings involving the battle over
Fusion GPS bank records.
With Trump and Bush appointed US Federal Judges now overseeing the lawsuits against both BuzzFeed and Fusion GPS in Washington D.C., this report continues, Aleksej Gubarev’s lawsuit in the Florida US Federal Court against BuzzFeed is still being overseen by the Clinton-appointed US Federal Judge John O'Sullivan—whose past judicial crimes are well documented—and whose gag order, and other rulings in this case, have all been designed to aid and protect BuzzFeed.
Specifically, this report details, US Federal Judge John O’Sullivan has protected BuzzFeed by his refusing to allow Aleksej Gubarev’s attorney’s to ask them who gave them the Trump-Russia Dossier in the first place—but that just days ago, on 22 December 2017, saw these attorneys for Gubarev shockingly dropping a bombshell when they announced that they had discovered the source on their own—and whose name they can release—but are, undoubtedly, waiting to do so in coordination with Gubarev’s other attorneys working on his Washington D.C. lawsuit.
In their knowing that the Trump-Russia Dossier was the
centerpiece of the entire political crisis overtaking America, and that this past April, CNN reported was being used by Obama’s FBI to
target Trump, this report continues,
the American leftist establishment
became terrified that the lawsuits filed against BuzzFeed by Aleksej Gubarev
would soon unravel this entire sordid plot—and that saw them strike back, on 30
December 2017, when the leftist New York
Times published an unverifiable screed now claiming that a minor Trump campaign worker named George Papadopoulos was the cause of
the entire Trump-Russia collusion
story—and that these leftists cheered the publishing of, with one “Deep
State” aligned ex-CIA
officer even stating: “This
leak of Papadopolous’ Hillary confession was timed to let Trump know the FBI is
taking off the gloves.”
Far from the FBI “taking off its gloves”,
though, this report explains, they are, without a doubt, putting them on before
even touching this New York Times
pile of word garbage—that was immediately “shredded
for being fake news”—and was so packed with outright lies and
falsehoods, even the anti-Trump, though highly respected, National Review
was forced to take it apart piece-by-piece in their scathingly worded article
titled “As
the Dossier Scandal Looms, the New York Times Struggles to Save Its Collusion
Tale”.
When
even the National Review comes to the defense of President Trump, these
American leftists must know their game is over
To the gravest warning, however, being
sounded to these American leftists,
who for the past year have infected all of the US with their “fake news”
Trump-Russia claims, this report
continues, comes from one of most highly revered leftist historians in their
nation named Professor
Jackson Lears, Ph.D.—who sits on the Board of Governors as the Distinguished Professor of History at Rutgers
University—and who, in the 4 January 2018 edition of the London Review of
Books (the
most respected magazine in the world), published the most eviscerating
article ever written against these Trump-Russia
lies titled “What
We Don’t Talk about When We Talk about Russian Hacking”—and wherein he
warned his fellow leftists of the falsehoods they were believing in by,
in part, stating:
A story that had circulated during the
campaign without much effect resurfaced: it involved the charge that Russian
operatives had hacked into the servers of the Democratic National Committee,
revealing embarrassing emails that damaged
This secular religion has attracted hordes
of converts in the first year of the Trump presidency. In its capacity to
exclude dissent, it is like no other formation of mass opinion in my adult
life, though it recalls a few dim childhood memories of anti-communist hysteria
during the early 1950s.
The centerpiece of the faith, based on the
hacking charge, is the belief that Vladimir Putin orchestrated an attack on
American democracy by ordering his minions to interfere in the election on
behalf of Trump. The story became gospel with breathtaking suddenness and
completeness. Doubters are perceived as heretics and as apologists for Trump
and Putin, the evil twins and co-conspirators behind this attack on American
democracy.
Responsibility for the absence of debate
lies in large part with the major media outlets. Their uncritical embrace and
endless repetition of the Russian hack story have made it seem a fait accompli
in the public mind. It is hard to estimate popular belief in this new orthodoxy,
but it does not seem to be merely a creed of
Like any orthodoxy worth its salt, the
religion of the Russian hack depends not on evidence but on ex cathedra
pronouncements on the part of authoritative institutions and their overlords.
Its scriptural foundation is a confused and largely fact-free ‘assessment’
produced last January by a small number of ‘hand-picked’ analysts – as James
Clapper, the director of National Intelligence, described them – from the CIA,
the FBI and the NSA.
The claims of the last were made with only
‘moderate’ confidence. The label Intelligence Community Assessment creates a
misleading impression of unanimity, given that only three of the 16
Assessments are based on collected
information, which is often incomplete or fragmentary, as well as logic,
argumentation and precedents.’ Yet the assessment has passed into the media
imagination as if it were unassailable fact, allowing journalists to assume
what has yet to be proved.
In doing so they serve as mouthpieces for
the intelligence agencies, or at least for those ‘hand-picked’ analysts.
...the established press is legitimating
pronouncements made by the Church Fathers of the national security state.
Clapper is among the most vigorous of these. He perjured himself before
Congress in 2013, when he denied that the NSA had ‘wittingly’ spied on
Americans – a lie for which he has never been held to account. In May 2017, he
told NBC’s Chuck Todd that the Russians were highly likely to have colluded
with Trump’s campaign because they are ‘almost genetically driven to co-opt,
penetrate, gain favour, whatever, which is a typical Russian technique’. The
current orthodoxy exempts the Church Fathers from standards imposed on ordinary
people, and condemns Russians – above all Putin – as uniquely, ‘almost
genetically’ diabolical.
And Clapper clapped his head when he lied
to Congress. An easy tell for any poker player. Yet the MSM somehow continues
to hold him in high regard.
... there are two other assumptions behind
the furore in
Edward Snowden and others familiar with the
NSA say that if long-distance hacking had taken place the agency would have
monitored it and could detail its existence without compromising their secret
sources and methods.
In September, Snowden told Der Spiegel that
the NSA ‘probably knows quite well who the invaders were’. And yet ‘it has not
presented any evidence, although I suspect it exists. The question is: why not?
… I suspect it discovered other attackers
in the systems, maybe there were six or seven groups at work. The NSA’s capacity to follow hacking to its
source is a matter of public record. When the agency investigated pervasive and
successful Chinese hacking into US military and defence industry installations,
it was able to trace the hacks to the building where they originated, a
People’s Liberation Army facility in
That information was published in the New
York Times but, this time, the NSA’s failure to provide evidence has gone curiously
unremarked. When The Intercept published a story about the NSA’s alleged
discovery that Russian military intelligence had attempted to hack into US
state and local election systems, the agency’s undocumented assertions about
the Russian origins of the hack were allowed to stand as unchallenged fact and
quickly became treated as such in the mainstream media.
It remains possible that Robert Mueller, a
former FBI director who has been appointed to investigate these allegations,
may turn up some compelling evidence of contacts between Trump’s people and
various Russians. It would be surprising if an experienced prosecutor empowered
to cast a dragnet came up empty-handed, and the arrests have already begun.
But what is striking about them is that the
charges have nothing to do with Russian interference in the election. There has
been much talk about the possibility that the accused may provide damaging
evidence against Trump in exchange for lighter sentences, but this is merely
speculation.
Paul Manafort, at one point Trump’s
campaign manager, has pleaded not guilty to charges of failing to register his
public relations firm as a foreign agent for the Ukrainian government and
concealing his millions of dollars in fees. But all this occurred before the 2016
campaign.
George Papadopolous, a foreign policy
adviser, has pleaded guilty to the charge of lying to the FBI about his
bungling efforts to arrange a meeting between Trump’s people and the Russian
government – an opportunity the Trump campaign declined.
Mueller’s most recent arrestee, Michael
Flynn, the unhinged Islamophobe who was briefly Trump’s national security
adviser, has pleaded guilty to charges of lying to the FBI about meeting the
Russian ambassador in December – weeks after the election.
This is the sort of backchannel diplomacy
that routinely occurs during the interim between one administration and the
next. It is not a sign of collusion.
So far, after months of ‘bombshells’ that
turn out to be duds, there is still no actual evidence for the claim that the
Kremlin ordered interference in the American election.
Meanwhile serious doubts have surfaced
about the technical basis for the hacking claims. Independent observers have
argued it is more likely that the emails were leaked from inside, not hacked
from outside.
Known, undoubtedly, by Professor Jackson Lear in his making this stunning warning to his “fellow travelers”,
this report concludes, were the shocking discoveries just revealed by the
highly influential American-Jewish
online magazine Tablet—who in
their article titled “Did
President Obama Read the ‘Steele Dossier’ in the White House Last August?”,
stunningly documented how the Obama-Clinton
regime illegally, and shamelessly, targeted Trump—and whose warning words are now echoing across America:
If a sitting president used the instruments
of state, including the intelligence community, to disseminate and legitimize a
piece of paid opposition research in order to first obtain warrants to spy on
the other party’s campaign, and then to de-legitimize the results of an
election once the other party’s candidate won, we’re
looking at a scandal that dwarfs Watergate—a
story not about a bad man in the White House, but about the subversion of key security institutions that are charged
with protecting core elements of our democratic process while operating largely
in the shadows.
Hillary Clinton campaign official Bill Ivey: “And
as I’ve mentioned, we’ve all been quite content to demean government, drop
civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant
citizenry...the unawareness remains strong but compliance is obviously fading
rapidly.”
[Ed. Note: To make sure this “compliance”
keeps “rapidly failing”, re-send this
report to others you may know who need the truth.]
January 2, 2018 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.
[Note:
Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the
information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the
many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal
strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human beings right to know
the truth. Due to our missions conflicts
with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding
misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like
us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note:
The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of
Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the
late global technology guru Wayne
Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to
promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]
[Note:
The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in this report refers to
Russian citadels, including in
If This Wasn’t So Deadly Serious, You’d Swear It Was All
Made Up!
Murder Of Chicago Cop Threatens To Engulf Entire World In
Flames
As New “God” Arises, World's Best Minds Warn “End Is Near”