World's Largest English Language News Service with Over 500 Articles
Updated Daily
"The News You Need Today…For The World You’ll Live In Tomorrow."
What You
Aren’t Being Told About The World You Live In
How The “Conspiracy Theory” Label Was Conceived To Derail The
Truth Movement
How Covert American Agents Infiltrate the Internet to
Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations
November 25, 2016
Most Expensive US-UK Warships Ever Built Lay “Dead In Water”
Due To
By: Sorcha Faal, and as
reported to her Western Subscribers
An astonishing Ministry of Defense (MoD) “urgent
action” bulletin circulating in the Kremlin today is reporting that two of
the West’s most expensive warships ever built now lay “dead in the water” after their propulsion systems were shut down by
Chinese manufactured microchips that Federation military intelligence experts
are still at a loss to explain why the United States and Britain even let these
sabotaging electronic devices to have been used by their navies in the first
place. [Note: Some
words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language
approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
USS Zumwalt, the most expensive
HMS Duncan, the most expensive British warship ever
built
According to this MoD bulletin, the United
States Navy’s (US Navy) $4.4 billion guided
missile destroyer USS
Zumwalt, while transversing the Panama Canal, suffered a
catastrophic propulsion failure on 21 November; while just two days later,
on 23 November, the British Royal Navy’s (Royal
Navy) $1.2
billion hi-tech destroyer HMS Duncan, likewise,
suffered a
catastrophic propulsion failure too while on NATO maneuvers.
To the commonality of both the United States
and Britain’s most expensive warships ever built suffering such a catastrophic
loss of propulsion, MoD experts in this bulletin point out, is directly due to
what are called Chinese “chip destroyers”—which
this bulletin explains are a type of microchip manufactured by the Chinese
People's Liberation Army (PLA)
that shortly after President Obama took power in the United States the
US Navy was forced to buy by the tens-of-thousands.
Even though proof
was given to the Obama regime of how dangerous these Chinese “chip destroyers” were, this bulletin
notes, the Pentagon, nevertheless, continued
purchasing and using them even while they were at the same time crashing
American military networks.
Equally as astonishing as the US Navy using
these Chinese “chip destroyers” in
their warships, missile and communication systems, this bulletin further notes,
was its purchase
and use of Chinese dry docks at the Bath Iron Works
shipyard where the USS Zumwalt was built—and that just two months ago
(September) their
experts were astonishingly in China looking to buy more of.
With these Chinese “chip destroyers” literally flooding into everything the US Navy and
Pentagon has built over the past decade, this bulletin continues, a cooperation
agreement signed in 2014 between the US Navy and Royal Navy have further
allowed these dangerous devices to be placed in Britain’s warships, weapons and
communication systems too.
MoD experts first hand knowledge of these
Chinese “chip destroyers”, this
bulletin continues, was gained during the Federations “experience/ordeal” with France in the Russian Navy’s planned 2009
purchase of two Mistral-class
amphibious assault ships that were filled with them—but whose sale to
Russia was
aborted in 2015 when the Federation said it wouldn’t take them—after which
they were sold
by France to Egypt and delivered in September, but with Polish Minister of
National Defense Antoni Macierewicz, on 4 November, stating that Egypt
then sold them back to Russia for €1.
Most amazing to note in this MoD bulletin’s
conclusion though is the discussion relating to how these Chinese “chip destroyed” Western warships should
be treated in “conflict/war”
situations—with some Federation naval experts advocating that “ships in distress” should never be fired
upon, but others arguing that even though these warships may be “dead in the water”, their weapons
systems still pose a “serious/grave”
threat and should be sunk.
November 25, 2016 © EU and US all rights
reserved. Permission to use this report
in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its
original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.
[Note:
Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the
information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the
many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly
disagree with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the
truth. Due to our missions conflicts
with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding
misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like
us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note:
The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of
Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the
late global technology guru Wayne
Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to
promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]
[Note:
The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in this report refers to
Russian citadels, including in
Donald Trump Victory Averts World War III, But Starts
American Revolution
They Are Going To Come For You…Why Are You
Helping Them?