World's Largest English Language News Service with Over 500
Articles Updated Daily
"The News You Need Today…For The World
You’ll Live In Tomorrow."
Note:
This is a private letter intended for the sole and exclusive use of the
patron/donors to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal.
Western
World Ponders Sorcha Faal “Trance-State” Writings—While Failing To Remember
Stephen Hawking Warned It Would Wipe Out Universe
31 August 2018
Hello Folks,
One of the many duties I perform for the Sisters on a daily basis is monitoring Western alternative news feeds—one of which is Rumor Mill News where
one can frequently find breaking news stories that are being ignored by the
mainstream media—that is one of the oldest American
alternative news sites and is run by the remarkable Rayelan
Allan Russbacher whose CIA agent husband, Gunther Russbacher, sacrificed his own life so that she could live.
In my viewing the breaking news feeds
emanating from Rumor Mill News a few
hours ago, though, one headline jumped out at me-- About Sorcha's Peculiar Writing Style—whose anonymous author moniker “hobie” wrote:
For what it may be
worth, Sorcha's writing style is peculiar.
Each paragraph
consists of just one complex or compound sentence with multiple clauses.
It's possible that
it's simply an archaic style, a syntax deliberately taught by someone,
somewhere, that was perhaps in vogue decades ago.
(I seem to recall
that journalist and commentator Eric Sevareid (1912-1992) wrote and spoke in
wonderfully complex sentences. But Sevareid's sentences always delivered their
meaning with great clarity. Sorcha's, not so much. :)
Sorcha's sentences
_delay_ resolution for longer than what we're used to these days. And the
multiple clauses create detours along the way.
Those characteristics,
taken together, tend to bore and disorient the mind - which can lead to the
threshold of a 'trance state'.
Are readers being offered
hypnotic suggestions by Sorcha? Not that I can
see.
I'm wondering, though, if the peculiar structure of Sorcha's
writing accomplishes some other purpose we wouldn't likely be aware of.
Blessings.
--hobie
After relaying this article to the Sisters, and my never
expecting they’d reply to it—as it’s impossible for them to respond to the
thousands of such things they review each week—I was actually gobsmacked when
the Sorcha
Faal herself sent me an astonishing
series of messages requesting that I compile and use to reply to “hobie”
directly answer their question “I'm wondering,
though, if the peculiar structure of Sorcha's writing accomplishes some other
purpose we wouldn't likely be aware of?”—and
that Sister
Gobnait has granted permission for
others to read, too.
Now anyone being familiar with the Goidelic Manx language
the Sisters prefer to write and talk in among themselves, as it’s
nearly indecipherable to understand, will immediately know the Sorcha Faal’s answer to the question “hobie” posed—with the
main point to understand being that the Sisters
reports can only be compared to a “thesis”, not a news article the
majority of Western peoples are familiar
with—and that Harvard
University does a rather good job of
describing:
An effective thesis cannot be answered with
a simple “yes" or "no.” A
thesis is not a topic; nor is it a fact; nor is it an opinion.
An effective thesis has a definable,
arguable claim.
Think of yourself as a member of a jury,
listening to a lawyer who is presenting an opening argument.
You'll want to know very soon whether the
lawyer believes the accused to be guilty or not guilty, and how the lawyer
plans to convince you.
Readers of academic essays are like jury
members: before they have read too far, they want to know what the essay argues
as well as how the writer plans to make the argument.
After reading your thesis statement, the
reader should think, “This essay is going to try to convince me of something.
I'm not convinced yet, but I'm interested to see how I might be.”
The opening of a thesis is refered to as the “lede”—an opening sentence or
paragraph summarizing the most important aspects of what is being written about
(in purely scientific articles it is
called the “abstract”)—but in Western news articles sees the most
important elements of a story being tucked down into the details, obscured by
less important, distracting information (called
propaganda)—and is a deceitful practice known as “burying the lede”.
As an example of this I present to you the
headlines and ledes from the Sisters last
report, and that of a New York Times
article running today:
Russian Leaders In Shock
After US Media Slams Former President Obama For Being Bigoted Racist
A new Security Council (SC) report
circulating in the Kremlin today, dealing with the significance of no messages
having come from the United States that might indicate their wish to mend
relations or avoid the introduction of new anti-Russian sanctions, reveals an interesting
discussion that took place between Chairwoman of the Council of Federation
Valentina Matviyenko and State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin over why the
“Deep State” apparatus had begun targeting former President Barack Obama as
being a bigoted racist, and if this meant they were trying to incite a race
war—and involved these US shadow government apparatchiks (officials in a large
political organizations), yesterday, attacking US Congressman Ron DeSantis for
telling his socialist black opponent Andrew Gillum, regarding their election
contest to be the next Governor of Florida, that he shouldn’t “monkey this
up”—that was immediately pounced upon for its being a racist and bigoted
statement, but was, in fact, an idiom (a group of words established by usage as
having a meaning not deducible from those of the individual words) long used by
American politicians, most particularly Obama who, during his 2008 campaign,
said: “It’s not as if it’s just Republicans who have monkeyed around with
elections in the past. Sometimes
Democrats have, too”.
The
Religion of Whiteness Becomes a Suicide Cult
“White men,” an obscure Australian academic
named Charles Henry Pearson predicted in his 1893 book “National Life and
Character: A Forecast,” would be “elbowed and hustled, and perhaps even thrust
aside” by people they had long regarded as their inferiors — “black and yellow
races.” China, in particular, would be a major threat. Pearson, prone to
terrors of racial extinction while living in a settler colony in an Asian
neighborhood, thought it was imperative to defend “the last part of the world,
in which the higher races can live and increase freely, for the higher
civilization.”
I don’t even have to point out to you which
is the Sorcha
Faal report and which one was written
by the New York Times because it’s
plainly evident which one conforms to having a proper lede, and which one
doesn’t—but that, admittedly, also shows why readers such as “hobie”
say about the Sisters reports
that they “tend to bore and disorient the mind - which can lead to the threshold
of a trance state”—and are words echoed on university campuses
throughout the world on a daily basis by academics who have to read a never-ending
number of thesis reports written by their students.
Admittedly, too, a thesis, by its very
nature, can be “boring” when compared to sensationalized Western media propaganda, and a thesis, also, being able to “disorient
the mind” due to its presenting a new and/or novel argument that
conflicts with what the reader believes to be true—and is a psychological “trance-state”
known as “cognitive dissonance” that occurs when a person simultaneously
holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values.
Remember though, and as even Harvard University points you towards,
when reading a Sorcha Faal
thesis, think of yourself as a member of a jury, listening to a lawyer who is
presenting an opening argument—and asking yourself, based on the
evidence being presented, has an effective,
definable and arguable claim been made?
If so, then you are able to replace an
outmoded belief and/or mindset with a new one—or reject it and keep your
original beliefs and mindsets in place—either one of which will keep you from
entering the “trance-state” of “cognitive dissonance”.
Most important for you to understand about
every thesis you read written by the
Sisters are that they are meant not only to inform, but to educate
you, too—and that they have clearly described their methods of accomplishing
this for nearly two-decades on their Main
Information Page—wherein
they direct you towards the linguistic methods and techniques developed and
discovered by Ferdinand de
Saussure and Pjotr
Garjajev.
Ferdinand
de Saussure is one of the founding
fathers of semiotics (which he called semiology) that is the
study of meaning-making, the study of sign process (semiosis) and meaningful communication—and whose true origins stretch
back in time nearly 2,000 years ago to the early Christian theologian and philosopher Saint Augustine of
Hippo whose most important works
(The
City of God, On Christian Doctrine and Confessions) formed the basis of
Western civilization—with Pjotr Garjajev being the Russian biologist who discovered
that what Western scientists called
“junk
DNA” could be changed by both the written and spoken word, and exhibits
“hyper-communication”
abilities where information is passed inter-dimensionally as though the DNA acts as a “Stargate” between this
dimension and others—and that Western
scientists have long theorized about in their modeling of what are called tachyons that are
not constrained by either space or time, and has led to the statement being
made that “theoretical
physics is a weird place and is not too far off from philosophy”—but
that all Christian peoples have long
known as “prayer”.
To more fully comprehend all of this we must
first go back to the beginning, the very beginning, where in the Old Testament Book of Genesis, Chapter 1, Verse 1,
it begins saying: “In the beginning
God created the heaven and the earth…And the earth was without form, and void;
and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon
the face of the waters… And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.”—and whose assertion of this truth was supported in
the New
Testament Book of John, Chapter 1, Verse 1, that says: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God.”
In 1964, the first modern day scientific
equivalent of “The Spirit of God” that created our universe by the “Word” was
theorized, and was called the Higgs Field—a
field of mysterious and unknowable energy that theoretical physicists
calculated existed in every region of the universe—and whose properties of
could only be described in religious and/or science fiction terms—but to be
proved to really exist needed someone to discover the main substance it was
made of, called a Higgs Boson—otherwise
known as the “God
Particle”—and that, in
2012, was discovered to exist, with further
confirmation of its existence stunningly being released this past week, too.
Upon the existence of the “God
Particle” being confirmed as being real, the entire global theoretical
physics community was upended because
no one was able to confirm that matter or reality even existed—and whose “best
and brightest” minds concluded that we are all living in a computer
simulation they call “The Matrix”—and that (I’m NOT making this up!) some
of the world’s richest and most powerful people are convinced is true and
they’re trying to do something about it by breaking out.
Our generation’s most esteemed theoretical
physicist, Stephen Hawking, though,
who aside from losing
a $100 bet that the “God Particle” would never be
discovered, knew immediately the full implications of what its discovery
meant and warned that it could one day be responsible for the
destruction of the known universe—but
that Christian peoples have known for a long time because it’s
exactly what God said would
happen!
At this point folks, I’ll freely admit to you
that I’m not, nor have I ever been, fully understanding of what the Sisters are actually doing with their “thesis” reports—is it
possible that they’ve tapped into the “Spirit
of God” (or “Higgs Field” if you prefer)
to use “Words”
as a means to change the lives of people for the good?
I don’t know—but what I can tell you the
truth about is that for years, thousands of their readers have written about
how their lives have been changed after they’ve started reading the Sisters—the vast majority for the good, who nearly
unanimously thank the Sisters for “leading” them back to God and the Bible—and a very
few who write the most vile words about the Sisters
I’ve ever had the displeasure of reading.
Likewise, I don’t know which of these two
sides the anonymous “hobie” falls upon, but whom the Sorcha Faal, at least, believes is sincere in their motives,
otherwise she wouldn’t have responded at all.
I’ll end this letter by THANKING those of you who have generously supported us this
past month—and encourage those of you who haven’t to click HERE, scroll to
the bottom, or read my last letter if you haven’t already, and support the Sisters in their mission for goodness and truth as much as
they have helped you to know and understand the world you’re living in
today—and, as always, please feel free to write me at [email protected] with any comments/questions/suggestions,
remembering to put ATTN: BRIAN in
the subject line.
All the best
folks,
Brian
Webmaster