
Sorcha Faal’s Books Available
Now In English!
Picking up the Pieces: Practical Guide for Surviving Economic Crashes,
Internal Unrest and Military Suppression
By: Sorcha
Faal “In the span of less than 3 months gasoline prices will rise 500%. The prices of both food and shelter rise over
300%. (Continued)
Partisans Handbook: Essential Survival Guide For
Resisting Foreign Military Occupation, Escape And Evasion Techniques, Surviving
Interrogation, Facing Execution, Wilderness Survival (Continued)
The Children of Winter: Apocalyptic Message of Hope By: Sorcha Faal "Not told by Sorcha
herself alone, but by the Children of Winter themselves, who at 6 years of age
the weather had no effect upon them as they walked naked in the snows of winter. Who at 10 years of age could walk thorough
boiling water with no burns or (Continued)
February 20, 2006
Russian Researchers Discover Western Genetic ‘Plot’ Targeting Muslims As United States
Nerve Gas Scare Secures New Draconian ‘Patriot Act’ Laws
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Russian Subscribers
Russian Intelligence Analysts are reporting today that a Western ‘plot’ led by the United States to
virtually annihilate Muslims by the Genetic Alteration of the world’s food
supply to make their race more susceptible to the Avian Flu Virus has been
accelerated after the discovery by Russian Agents of these plans and Sweden’s
capturing of one of our Researchers working to stop their plans, and as we can
read as reported by the Reuters News Service in their article titled "Sweden
charges Russian researcher with spying", and which says:
"A
Swedish court charged a Russian researcher at an agricultural genetics
laboratory in Sweden with spying for a foreign power on Friday, and the chief
prosecutor said the suspect had put the armed forces at risk. The man, who was
not named but was in his 30s, was arrested on Wednesday in the university town
of Uppsala, just north of Stockholm, on suspicion of carrying out
"espionage activities" in early 2005, Sweden's counter-espionage
service SAPO said. Chief Prosecutor Tomas Lindstrand
was quoted by local radio as saying the man's activities had "caused
damage to our armed forces", affecting Sweden's national security."
It is important to also note Sweden’s response to the information retrieved
from their US funded agricultural genetics program as putting their ‘armed forces at risk’, and in light of
the Muslim world’s reaction to the Western governments assault upon their
religion in what many in the world are now seeing is in fact the latest Crusade
by the West against Islam, Total World War cannot be far behind these latest
events.
As we have reported on many times, the Western governments fears of the
rising of the Muslim Nations, along with the powerful rise of both China and
India into World Superpowers, has put them upon a course, as they believe, to
either catastrophically reduce the populations of their adversaries or face a
total loss of their control over the World and its resources.
These actions by the Western governments are further fueled by the
catastrophic Earth Changes now occurring on a daily basis as the world’s
weather systems descend further into total chaos, and which Western scientists
are now belatedly attempting to warn their populations about, and as we can
read as reported by Australia’s The Age News Service in their article titled "Flooding
fears as glaciers melt faster: Alarming satellite images show seas rising far
faster than expected", and which says, "GREENLAND'S
glaciers are melting into the sea twice as fast as previously believed, the
result of a warming trend that renders obsolete predictions of how quickly the
Earth's oceans will rise over the next century."
According to these reports, the Western Nations ‘plot’ for the decimation of Muslim peoples is based upon a unique genotype subset
in both Arab and Persian races that when modified by their ingestion of
Genetically Modified Western foods would alter a receptor gene within them thus
making them more susceptible to the H5N1 Avian Flu Virus, and which as we can
read as reported by the PRNewswire News Service in
their article titled "Recombinomics
Inc. Predicts a New Genetic Change in the H5N1 (Avian Flu) Virus" is
rapidly mutating towards full human-to-human transmission:
"Recombinomics is issuing a new prediction and warning of a
likely alteration in the avian influenza H5N1 hemagglutinin
gene. Like the warning/prediction issued on October 22nd, 2005, this new
alteration will increase the virus' affinity for human receptors and lead to
more efficient transmission of H5N1 to humans. The company has notified the WHO
of its prediction and warning regarding the near term likelihood of this
genetic alteration occurring.
In October, Recombinomic's prediction/warning was based upon H5N1
entering the Middle East via migratory birds, where another avian influenza,
H9N2 was endemic. Recombinomics, utilizing its patent
pending approach, predicted that the H gene in H5N1 would exchange genetic
information with the H gene in H9N2 and would acquire the genetic change S227N
(also called S223N). This alteration had been previously shown to increase the
affinity of H5N1 for human receptors. In late December 2005, the first human
infections by the Qinghai strain of H5N1 were reported in Turkey. S227N was
detected in the index case for that outbreak with six additional cases
confirmed four of whom died.
Today, Recombinomics is predicting a similar change in the
adjacent position of the H5N1 virus' receptor binding domain. The donor
sequences are again on the H, but in H1N1 European swine sequences. The new
genetic change, G228S, has also been previously shown to increase the affinity
for human receptors. Like H9N2 in the Middle East, H1N1 is endemic in swine
populations in Europe. Infection by H5N1 in H1N1 infected swine will allow the
viruses to exchange genetic information via recombination and allow H5N1 to
acquire S228N. The region of identity between H5N1 and H1N1 is downstream from
the S227N position, so H5N1, with and without the S227N change, can acquire
this new sequence. This sequence acquisition by the H5N1 virus will also lead
to more efficient transmission to humans.
"H5N1 is
migrating into areas where it is encountering unique influenza sero-types it has not encountered while largely confined to
Asia over the past few years. This expanded geographical reach allows H5N1 to
exchange genetic material with novel donor sequences, which under the
appropriate selection pressures, enables the genetic changes to become fixed in
the genome of the virus. H5N1 is in the process of acquiring genetic
information that allows for more efficient infections of humans", said Recombinomics President, Dr, Henry
Niman."
Like the Nazi Germans mass drugging of their entire populace from the mind
altering poison sodium fluoride, the Americans of today have been assaulted by
the mass poisoning of their food supply by Genetically Modified plants and
grains, and which now encompass over
two thirds of their entire food supply, but are now likewise susceptible to
the H5N1 Avian Flu Virus.
Also like the Nazi Germans of last century, the United States Military
Authorities have put the control of these most dangerous of Genetically
Modified Monstrosities into their corporations, and as we can read:
"No
Regulated Health Safety Testing The FDA only requests of firms that they
conduct their own tests of new GM products in what Vice President Quale back in 1992 referred to as a "regulatory relief
program." The FDA makes no review of those tests unless voluntarily
requested by the company producing the product. Companies present their
internal company records of tests showing a product is safe - essentially
having the "fox oversee the chicken coup." As Louis J. Pribyl, an FDA microbiologist explained, companies tailor
tests to get the results they need.
They further relinquish responsibility as Pjil Angell, Monsanto's director
of corporate communications expressed it "Monsanto should not have to
vouchsafe the safety of biotech foods. Our interest is in selling…Assuring its
safety is the FDA's job." But the FDA has not assumed the responsibility.
Essentially it is "like playing Russian roulette with public health,"
says Philip J. Regal, a biologist at the University of Minnesota. In his
contacts with the FDA, he noted that in the policy of helping the biotech
industry grow "government scientist after scientist acknowledged there was
no way to assure the health safety of genetically engineered food… [yet] society was going to have to bear an unavoidable
measure of risk." The situation was summarized by Richard Steinbrecher, a geneticist working for the Women's
Environmental Network "To use genetic engineering to manipulate plants,
release them into the environment and introduce them into our food chains is
scientifically premature, unsafe and irresponsible."
And what sadly the Muslim of the World will soon be learning is that the
Western Nations conquest of not only their lands, but the entire World, if that
be possible, will be based upon their concept of Bio-Colonization, and
where in past centuries, countries managed to overrun others by means of fierce
or technologically superior armies. The combined control of genetic and
agricultural resources holds a yet more powerful weapon for the invasion of
cultures. For only when a person loses food self-sufficiency do they become
wholly dependent and subservient.
It is no wonder, and as we quoted from the Swedish Government at the
beginning of this report, that Russia’s retrieval of this information from Sweden’s
agricultural genetic services does indeed pose the gravest threat to their, and
other nations, security, and which also must be viewed in the light of the
recent ruling by the World Trade Organization against Europe regarding
Genetically Modified foods, and as we can read as reported by the Washington
Times News Service in their article titled "Pulling
EU to the harvest", and which says:
"A
commission of the World Trade Organization has held the European Union's
1998-2004 moratorium on planting and importing
genetically-modified food and cotton was not based on science. The U.S. has
utilized GM crops since 1996, with millions of acres planted and millions of
tons of GM crops harvested and consumed since then -- with no adverse effect
seen on health or the environment."
As we see all too frequently with American Propaganda however, and this is
yet another example, the statement of ‘no
adverse effect seen on health or the environment’ does not come close to
the truth:
“Recorded Deaths from GM In 1989, dozens of
Americans died and several thousands were afflicted and impaired by a
genetically altered version of the food supplement – L-tryptophan.
A settlement of $2 billion dollars was paid by Showa Denko, Japan’s third
largest chemical company. (Mayeno
and Gleich, 1994).
Near-deaths from Allergic Reactions In
1996, Brazil nut genes were spliced into soybeans by a company called Pioneer
Hi-Bred. Some individuals, however, are so allergic to this nut,
they go into apoplectic shock (similar to a severe bee sting reaction) which
can cause death. Animal tests confirmed the peril and fortunately the product
was removed from the market before any fatalities occurred. "The next case
could be less than ideal and the public less fortunate," writes Marion
Nestle, head of the Nutrition Department of NYU in an editorial to the New
England Journal of Medicine. About 25% of Americans have adverse reactions to
foods. 8% of children and 2% of adults have food allergies as tested by blood immunoglobins.
Direct Cancer and Degenerative Disease
Links In 1994, FDA approved Monsanto's rBGH, a
genetically produced growth hormone, for injection into dairy cows – even
though scientists warned the resulting increase of IGF-1, a potent chemical
hormone, is linked to 400-500% higher risks of human breast, prostrate, and
colon cancer. According to Dr. Samuel Epstein of the University of Chicago, it
"induces the malignant transformation of human breast epithelial
cells." Rat studies confirmed the suspicion and showed internal organ
damage with rBGH ingestion. In fact, the FDA's own
experiments indicated a spleen mass increase of 46% - a sign of developing
leukemia.
Superviruses
Viruses can mix with genes of other viruses and retroviruses such as HIV. This
can give rise to more deadly viruses – and at rates higher than previously
thought. One study showed that gene mixing occurred in viruses in just 8 weeks
(Kleiner, 1997). This kind of scenario applies to the
cauliflower mosaic virus CaMV,
the most common virus used in genetic engineering - in Round Up ready soy of
Monsanto, Bt-maise of Novaris,
and GM cotton and canola. It is a kind of "pararetrovirus"
or what multiplies by making DNA from RNA. It is somewhat similar to Hepatitis
B and HIV viruses and can pose immense dangers. In a Canadian study, a plant
was infected with a crippled cucumber mosaic virus that lacked a gene needed
for movement between plant cells.
Within less than two weeks, the crippled
plant found what it needed from neighboring genes - as evidence of gene mixing.
This is significant because genes that cause diseases are often crippled to
make the end product "safe." Results of this kind led the US
Department of Agriculture to hold a meeting in October of 1997 to discuss the
risks and dangers of gene mixing and superviruses,
but no regulatory action was taken.
Antibiotic Threat – Via Milk Cows injected
with rBGH have a much higher
level of udder infections and require more antibiotics. This leaves
unacceptable levels of antibiotic residues in the milk. Scientists have warned
of public health hazards due to growing antibiotic resistance.
Antibiotic Threat – Via Plants Much of genetic implantation uses a marker to track where
the gene goes into the cell. GM maize plants use an ampicillin
resistant gene. In 1998, the British Royal Society called for the banning of this
marker as it threatens a vital antibiotic’s use. The resistant qualities of GM
bacteria in food can be transferred to other bacteria in the environment and
throughout the human body.
Interior Toxins "Pesticidal
foods" have genes that produce a toxic pesticide inside the food’s cells.
This represents the first time "cell-interior toxicity" is being sold
for human consumption. There is little knowledge of the potential long-term
health impacts.
Lowered Nutrition A study in the Journal
of Medicinal Food (Dr. Marc Lappe, 1999) showed that
certain GM foods have lower levels of vital nutrients – especially phytoestrogen compounds thought to protect the body from
heart disease and cancer. In another study of GM Vica
Faba, a bean in the same family as soy, there was
also an increase in estrogen levels, what raises health issues - especially in
infant soy formulas. Milk from cows with rBGH
contains substantially higher levels of pus, bacteria, and fat. Monsanto's
analysis of glyphosate-resistant soya
showed the GM-line contained 28% more Kunitz-trypsin
inhibitor, a known anti-nutrient and allergen.
Toxicity to Soil The
industry marketing pitch to the public is that bioengineered seeds and plants
will help the environment by reducing toxic herbicide/pesticide use. Isolated
examples are given, but the overall reality is exactly opposite. The majority
of GM agricultural products are developed specifically for toxin-resistance -
namely for higher doses of herbicides/ pesticides sold by the largest producer
companies – Monsanto, Dupont Novaris,
Dow, Bayer, Ciba-Geigy, Hoescht, AgroEvo,
and Rhone-Poulenc. Also the majority of research for
future products involves transgenic strains for increased chemical resistance.
Not to be fooled, the primary intent is to sell more, not less of their
products and to circumvent patent laws.
According to an article by R.J. Goldburg scientists predict herbicide use will triple as a
result of GM products. As an example of the feverish attempt to expand
herbicide use, Monsanto's patent for Roundup was scheduled to expire. Not to
lose their market share, Monsanto came up with the idea of creating
"Roundup Ready" seeds. It bought out seed companies to monopolize the
terrain - then licensing the seeds to farmers with the requirement that they
continue buying Roundup past the expiration of the patent. These contracts had
stiff financial penalties if farmers used any other herbicide. As early as
1996, the investment re